Improving Users' Mental Model with Attention-directed Counterfactual Edits
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In the domain of Visual Question Answering (VQA), studies have shown improvement in users' mental model of the VQA system when they are exposed to examples of how these systems answer certain Image-Question (IQ) pairs. In this work, we show that showing controlled counterfactual image-question examples are more effective at improving the mental model of users as compared to simply showing random examples. We compare a generative approach and a retrieval-based approach to show counterfactual examples. We use recent advances in generative adversarial networks (GANs) to generate counterfactual images by deleting and inpainting certain regions of interest in the image. We then expose users to changes in the VQA system's answer on those altered images. To select the region of interest for inpainting, we experiment with using both human-annotated attention maps and a fully automatic method that uses the VQA system's attention values. Finally, we test the user's mental model by asking them to predict the model's performance on a test counterfactual image. We note an overall improvement in users' accuracy to predict answer change when shown counterfactual explanations. While realistic retrieved counterfactuals obviously are the most effective at improving the mental model, we show that a generative approach can also be equally effective.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 71 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Oct 2021.
Builds on
27 of 71 references.
References · 27
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2017Mask R-CNNcited by 7,277
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
- 2016Making the V in VQA Matter: Elevating the Role of Image Understanding in Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,516
- 2015VQA: Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,506
- 2017Bottom-Up and Top-Down Attention for Image Captioning and Visual Question Answeringcited by 1,312
- 2017Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPRcited by 1,089
- 2019Counterfactual Visual Explanationscited by 313
- 2016Hierarchical Question-Image Co-Attention for Visual Question Answeringcited by 278
- 2016Multimodal Compact Bilinear Pooling for Visual Question Answering and Visual Groundingcited by 243
- 2018On Human Predictions with Explanations and Predictions of Machine Learning Models: A Case Study on Deception Detectioncited by 159
15 more
- 2018Explaining Image Classifiers by Counterfactual Generationcited by 144
- 2016Human Attention in Visual Question Answering: Do Humans and Deep Networks Look at the Same Regions?cited by 111
- 2019Towards Causal VQA: Revealing and Reducing Spurious Correlations by Invariant and Covariant Semantic Editingcited by 108
- 2020Good Counterfactuals and Where to Find Them: A Case-Based Technique for Generating Counterfactuals for Explainable AI (XAI)cited by 79
- 2017Tips and Tricks for Visual Question Answering: Learnings from the 2017 Challengecited by 76
- 2018How do Humans Understand Explanations from Machine Learning Systems? An Evaluation of the Human-Interpretability of Explanationcited by 72
- 2019An Evaluation of the Human-Interpretability of Explanationcited by 71
- 2015Ask, Attend and Answer: Exploring Question-Guided Spatial Attention for Visual Question Answeringcited by 66
- 2018Do Explanations make VQA Models more Predictable to a Human?cited by 52
- 2019Sunny and Dark Outside?! Improving Answer Consistency in VQA through Entailed Question Generationcited by 36
- 2016Question Relevance in VQA: Identifying Non-Visual And False-Premise Questionscited by 16
- 2020A Study on Multimodal and Interactive Explanations for Visual Question Answeringcited by 14
- 2019Explanation vs Attention: A Two-Player Game to Obtain Attention for VQAcited by 12
- 2020The Impact of Explanations on AI Competency Prediction in VQAcited by 5
- 2019Can You Explain That? Lucid Explanations Help Human-AI Collaborative Image Retrievalcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 3; 2024: 1.
5 papers.
- 2022Making Heads or Tails: Towards Semantically Consistent Visual Counterfactualscited by 30
- 2023ALMANACS: A Simulatability Benchmark for Language Model Explainabilitycited by 11
- 2023Capturing Humans' Mental Models of AI: An Item Response Theory Approachcited by 8
- 2023Towards Effective Human-AI Decision-Making: The Role of Human Learning in Appropriate Reliance on AI Advicecited by 8
- 2024Cognitive Spillover in Human-AI Teamscited by 3
- 2024Cognitive Spillover in Human-AI Teams3 Jul 2024
- 2023ALMANACS: A Simulatability Benchmark for Language Model Explainability20 Dec 2023
- 2023Towards Effective Human-AI Decision-Making: The Role of Human Learning in Appropriate Reliance on AI Advice3 Oct 2023
- 2023Capturing Humans' Mental Models of AI: An Item Response Theory Approach15 May 2023
- 2022Making Heads or Tails: Towards Semantically Consistent Visual Counterfactuals24 Mar 2022