Compositional Generalization in Dependency Parsing
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Compositionality -- the ability to combine familiar units like words into novel phrases and sentences -- has been the focus of intense interest in artificial intelligence in recent years. To test compositional generalization in semantic parsing, Keysers et al. (2020) introduced Compositional Freebase Queries (CFQ). This dataset maximizes the similarity between the test and train distributions over primitive units, like words, while maximizing the compound divergence: the dissimilarity between test and train distributions over larger structures, like phrases. Dependency parsing, however, lacks a compositional generalization benchmark. In this work, we introduce a gold-standard set of dependency parses for CFQ, and use this to analyze the behavior of a state-of-the art dependency parser (Qi et al., 2020) on the CFQ dataset. We find that increasing compound divergence degrades dependency parsing performance, although not as dramatically as semantic parsing performance. Additionally, we find the performance of the dependency parser does not uniformly degrade relative to compound divergence, and the parser performs differently on different splits with the same compound divergence. We explore a number of hypotheses for what causes the non-uniform degradation in dependency parsing performance, and identify a number of syntactic structures that drive the dependency parser's lower performance on the most challenging splits.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Oct 2021.
Builds on
14 of 20 references.
References · 14
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2020Stanza: A Python Natural Language Processing Toolkit for Many Human Languagescited by 723
- 2018Universal Transformerscited by 647
- 2019Measuring Compositional Generalization: A Comprehensive Method on Realistic Datacited by 284
- 2020Universal Dependencies v2: An Evergrowing Multilingual Treebank Collectioncited by 271
- 2020COGS: A Compositional Generalization Challenge Based on Semantic Interpretationcited by 263
- 2020A Benchmark for Systematic Generalization in Grounded Language Understandingcited by 108
- 2020Compositional Generalization in Semantic Parsing: Pre-training vs. Specialized Architecturescited by 95
- 2020Span-based Semantic Parsing for Compositional Generalizationcited by 77
- 2019CLOSURE: Assessing Systematic Generalization of CLEVR Modelscited by 63
- 2021Unlocking Compositional Generalization in Pre-trained Models Using Intermediate Representationscited by 55
- 2020Hierarchical Poset Decoding for Compositional Generalization in Languagecited by 26
2 more
- 2017Universal Semantic Parsingcited by 21
- 2020*-CFQ: Analyzing the Scalability of Machine Learning on a Compositional Taskcited by 16
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 1.
4 papers.
- 2022State-of-the-art generalisation research in NLP: A taxonomy and reviewcited by 98
- 2021Systematic Generalization with Edge Transformerscited by 38
- 2023On Evaluating Multilingual Compositional Generalization with Translated Datasetscited by 6
- 2024Machine Learning and Data Analysis Using Posets: A Surveycited by 0
- 2024Machine Learning and Data Analysis Using Posets: A Survey3 Apr 2024
- 2023On Evaluating Multilingual Compositional Generalization with Translated Datasets20 Jun 2023
- 2022State-of-the-art generalisation research in NLP: A taxonomy and review6 Oct 2022
- 2021Systematic Generalization with Edge Transformers1 Dec 2021