mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Distantly-Supervised Evidence Retrieval Enables Question Answering without Evidence Annotation

arXiv 2110.04889 ↗First posted 10 Oct 2021cs.CLcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Open-domain question answering answers a question based on evidence retrieved from a large corpus. State-of-the-art neural approaches require intermediate evidence annotations for training. However, such intermediate annotations are expensive, and methods that rely on them cannot transfer to the more common setting, where only question-answer pairs are available. This paper investigates whether models can learn to find evidence from a large corpus, with only distant supervision from answer labels for model training, thereby generating no additional annotation cost. We introduce a novel approach (DistDR) that iteratively improves over a weak retriever by alternately finding evidence from the up-to-date model and encouraging the model to learn the most likely evidence. Without using any evidence labels, DistDR is on par with fully-supervised state-of-the-art methods on both multi-hop and single-hop QA benchmarks. Our analysis confirms that DistDR finds more accurate evidence over iterations, which leads to model improvements.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Oct 2021.

Builds on

26 of 36 references.

References · 26

  1. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
  2. 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,115
  3. 2020Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 3,779
  4. 2018HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 3,686
  5. 2017TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehensioncited by 2,895
  6. 2020REALM: Retrieval-Augmented Language Model Pre-Trainingcited by 2,126
  7. 2020Leveraging Passage Retrieval with Generative Models for Open Domain Question Answeringcited by 1,203
  8. 2019DROP: A Reading Comprehension Benchmark Requiring Discrete Reasoning Over Paragraphscited by 883
  9. 2020Approximate Nearest Neighbor Negative Contrastive Learning for Dense Text Retrievalcited by 846
  10. 2017Reading Wikipedia to Answer Open-Domain Questionscited by 777
  11. 2019Latent Retrieval for Weakly Supervised Open Domain Question Answeringcited by 691
  12. 2020Towards Faithfully Interpretable NLP Systems: How should we define and evaluate faithfulness?cited by 590
14 more
  1. 2017Adversarial Examples for Evaluating Reading Comprehension Systemscited by 568
  2. 2018TVQA: Localized, Compositional Video Question Answeringcited by 463
  3. 2017SearchQA: A New Q&A Dataset Augmented with Context from a Search Enginecited by 221
  4. 2020Answering Complex Open-Domain Questions with Multi-Hop Dense Retrievalcited by 160
  5. 2019Learning to Retrieve Reasoning Paths over Wikipedia Graph for Question Answeringcited by 147
  6. 2020Beat the AI: Investigating Adversarial Human Annotation for Reading Comprehensioncited by 131
  7. 2017Simple and Effective Multi-Paragraph Reading Comprehensioncited by 120
  8. 2014Asymmetric LSH (ALSH) for Sublinear Time Maximum Inner Product Search (MIPS)cited by 109
  9. 2019Compositional Questions Do Not Necessitate Multi-hop Reasoningcited by 87
  10. 2019A Discrete Hard EM Approach for Weakly Supervised Question Answeringcited by 78
  11. 2020TORQUE: A Reading Comprehension Dataset of Temporal Ordering Questionscited by 65
  12. 2021Multi-Step Reasoning Over Unstructured Text with Beam Dense Retrievalcited by 25
  13. 2020Probabilistic Assumptions Matter: Improved Models for Distantly-Supervised Document-Level Question Answeringcited by 17
  14. 2017R3: Reinforced Reader-Ranker for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 2; 2024: 1.

5 papers.