Self-explaining Neural Network with Concept-based Explanations for ICU Mortality Prediction
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Complex deep learning models show high prediction tasks in various clinical prediction tasks but their inherent complexity makes it more challenging to explain model predictions for clinicians and healthcare providers. Existing research on explainability of deep learning models in healthcare have two major limitations: using post-hoc explanations and using raw clinical variables as units of explanation, both of which are often difficult for human interpretation. In this work, we designed a self-explaining deep learning framework using the expert-knowledge driven clinical concepts or intermediate features as units of explanation. The self-explaining nature of our proposed model comes from generating both explanations and predictions within the same architectural framework via joint training. We tested our proposed approach on a publicly available Electronic Health Records (EHR) dataset for predicting patient mortality in the ICU. In order to analyze the performance-interpretability trade-off, we compared our proposed model with a baseline having the same set-up but without the explanation components. Experimental results suggest that adding explainability components to a deep learning framework does not impact prediction performance and the explanations generated by the model can provide insights to the clinicians to understand the possible reasons behind patient mortality.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Oct 2021.
Builds on
19 of 41 references.
References · 19
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
- 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,348
- 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,454
- 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,309
- 2020Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 1,022
- 2018Towards Robust Interpretability with Self-Explaining Neural Networkscited by 505
- 2016RETAIN: An Interpretable Predictive Model for Healthcare using Reverse Time Attention Mechanismcited by 344
- 2017The (Un)reliability of saliency methodscited by 331
- 2018BRITS: Bidirectional Recurrent Imputation for Time Seriescited by 288
- 2017Deep Learning for Case-Based Reasoning through Prototypes: A Neural Network that Explains Its Predictionscited by 234
- 2020Problems with Shapley-value-based explanations as feature importance measurescited by 198
- 2019What Clinicians Want: Contextualizing Explainable Machine Learning for Clinical End Usecited by 134
7 more
- 2020Explainable Deep Learning: A Field Guide for the Uninitiatedcited by 127
- 2018RetainVis: Visual Analytics with Interpretable and Interactive Recurrent Neural Networks on Electronic Medical Recordscited by 61
- 2018Patient2Vec: A Personalized Interpretable Deep Representation of the Longitudinal Electronic Health Recordcited by 30
- 2018DeepSOFA: A Continuous Acuity Score for Critically Ill Patients using Clinically Interpretable Deep Learningcited by 22
- 2020Concept-based model explanations for Electronic Health Recordscited by 14
- 2018What is Interpretable? Using Machine Learning to Design Interpretable Decision-Support Systemscited by 11
- 2018Machine Learning Interpretability: A Science rather than a toolcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
2 papers.