mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Decoding ECoG signal into 3D hand translation using deep learning

arXiv 2110.03528 ↗First posted 5 Oct 2021eess.SP cs.LGcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Motor brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) are a promising technology that may enable motor-impaired people to interact with their environment. Designing real-time and accurate BCI is crucial to make such devices useful, safe, and easy to use by patients in a real-life environment. Electrocorticography (ECoG)-based BCIs emerge as a good compromise between invasiveness of the recording device and good spatial and temporal resolution of the recorded signal. However, most ECoG signal decoders used to predict continuous hand movements are linear models. These models have a limited representational capacity and may fail to capture the relationship between ECoG signal and continuous hand movements. Deep learning (DL) models, which are state-of-the-art in many problems, could be a solution to better capture this relationship. In this study, we tested several DL-based architectures to predict imagined 3D continuous hand translation using time-frequency features extracted from ECoG signals. The dataset used in the analysis is a part of a long-term clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02550522) and was acquired during a closed-loop experiment with a tetraplegic subject. The proposed architectures include multilayer perceptron (MLP), convolutional neural networks (CNN), and long short-term memory networks (LSTM). The accuracy of the DL-based and multilinear models was compared offline using cosine similarity. Our results show that CNN-based architectures outperform the current state-of-the-art multilinear model. The best architecture exploited the spatial correlation between neighboring electrodes with CNN and benefited from the sequential character of the desired hand trajectory by using LSTMs. Overall, DL increased the average cosine similarity, compared to the multilinear model, by up to 60%, from 0.189 to 0.302 and from 0.157 to 0.249 for the left and right hand, respectively.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 103 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Oct 2021.

Builds on

14 of 103 references.

References · 14

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  4. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  5. 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 6,979
  6. 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
  7. 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 4,993
  8. 2015Fast and Accurate Deep Network Learning by Exponential Linear Units (ELUs)cited by 1,061
  9. 2016EEGNet: A Compact Convolutional Network for EEG-based Brain-Computer Interfacescited by 616
  10. 2019Deep learning-based electroencephalography analysis: a systematic reviewcited by 155
  11. 2017Online Deep Learning: Learning Deep Neural Networks on the Flycited by 86
  12. 2015Learning Representations from EEG with Deep Recurrent-Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 45
2 more
  1. 2019Effective and Efficient Dropout for Deep Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 21
  2. 2019Rethinking the Usage of Batch Normalization and Dropout in the Training of Deep Neural Networkscited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

5 papers.