A Logic-Based Framework for Natural Language Inference in Dutch
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We present a framework for deriving inference relations between Dutch sentence pairs. The proposed framework relies on logic-based reasoning to produce inspectable proofs leading up to inference labels; its judgements are therefore transparent and formally verifiable. At its core, the system is powered by two λ-calculi, used as syntactic and semantic theories, respectively. Sentences are first converted to syntactic proofs and terms of the linear λ-calculus using a choice of two parsers: an Alpino-based pipeline, and Neural Proof Nets. The syntactic terms are then converted to semantic terms of the simply typed λ-calculus, via a set of hand designed type- and term-level transformations. Pairs of semantic terms are then fed to an automated theorem prover for natural logic which reasons with them while using the lexical relations found in the Open Dutch WordNet. We evaluate the reasoning pipeline on the recently created Dutch natural language inference dataset, and achieve promising results, remaining only within a 1.1-3.2% performance margin to strong neural baselines. To the best of our knowledge, the reasoning pipeline is the first logic-based system for Dutch.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Oct 2021.
Builds on
21 of 49 references.
References · 21
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2019Right for the Wrong Reasons: Diagnosing Syntactic Heuristics in Natural Language Inferencecited by 864
- 2018Annotation Artifacts in Natural Language Inference Datacited by 656
- 2018Hypothesis Only Baselines in Natural Language Inferencecited by 291
- 2018Learning Latent Permutations with Gumbel-Sinkhorn Networkscited by 172
- 2018Breaking NLI Systems with Sentences that Require Simple Lexical Inferencescited by 134
- 2020RobBERT: a Dutch RoBERTa-based Language Modelcited by 88
- 2019Probing Natural Language Inference Models through Semantic Fragmentscited by 64
- 2018Performance Impact Caused by Hidden Bias of Training Data for Recognizing Textual Entailmentcited by 58
- 2019Can neural networks understand monotonicity reasoning?cited by 45
- 2017The Parallel Meaning Bank: Towards a Multilingual Corpus of Translations Annotated with Compositional Meaning Representationscited by 41
- 2019HELP: A Dataset for Identifying Shortcomings of Neural Models in Monotonicity Reasoningcited by 35
9 more
- 2021SICKNL: A Dataset for Dutch Natural Language Inferencecited by 20
- 2018Behavior Analysis of NLI Models: Uncovering the Influence of Three Factors on Robustnesscited by 17
- 2017LangPro: Natural Language Theorem Provercited by 15
- 2021Exploring Transitivity in Neural NLI Models through Veridicalitycited by 15
- 2018Acquisition of Phrase Correspondences using Natural Deduction Proofscited by 8
- 2020Neural Proof Netscited by 8
- 2020Learning as Abduction: Trainable Natural Logic Theorem Prover for Natural Language Inferencecited by 6
- 2019Constructive Type-Logical Supertagging with Self-Attention Networkscited by 5
- 2019AE THEL: Automatically Extracted Typelogical Derivations for Dutchcited by 5
Built on by
Not cited yet.