mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

On Cropped versus Uncropped Training Sets in Tabular Structure Detection

arXiv 2110.02933 ↗First posted 6 Oct 2021cs.CVcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Automated document processing for tabular information extraction is highly desired in many organizations, from industry to government. Prior works have addressed this problem under table detection and table structure detection tasks. Proposed solutions leveraging deep learning approaches have been giving promising results in these tasks. However, the impact of dataset structures on table structure detection has not been investigated. In this study, we provide a comparison of table structure detection performance with cropped and uncropped datasets. The cropped set consists of only table images that are cropped from documents assuming tables are detected perfectly. The uncropped set consists of regular document images. Experiments show that deep learning models can improve the detection performance by up to 9% in average precision and average recall on the cropped versions. Furthermore, the impact of cropped images is negligible under the Intersection over Union (IoU) values of 50%-70% when compared to the uncropped versions. However, beyond 70% IoU thresholds, cropped datasets provide significantly higher detection performance.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Oct 2021.

Builds on

21 of 39 references.

References · 21

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,639
  3. 2017Mask R-CNNcited by 7,277
  4. 2016Feature Pyramid Networks for Object Detectioncited by 5,036
  5. 2015Fast R-CNNcited by 2,933
  6. 2016Aggregated Residual Transformations for Deep Neural Networkscited by 2,546
  7. 2019Deep High-Resolution Representation Learning for Visual Recognitioncited by 1,420
  8. 2019MMDetection: Open MMLab Detection Toolbox and Benchmarkcited by 1,385
  9. 2017Cascade R-CNN: Delving into High Quality Object Detectioncited by 1,276
  10. 2020Image Segmentation Using Deep Learning: A Surveycited by 660
  11. 2019Hybrid Task Cascade for Instance Segmentationcited by 481
  12. 2019Cascade R-CNN: High Quality Object Detection and Instance Segmentationcited by 429
9 more
  1. 2019Image-based table recognition: data, model, and evaluationcited by 237
  2. 2016Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learningcited by 209
  3. 2020Global Table Extractor (GTE): A Framework for Joint Table Identification and Cell Structure Recognition Using Visual Contextcited by 147
  4. 2020CascadeTabNet: An approach for end to end table detection and structure recognition from image-based documentscited by 98
  5. 2020A Survey on Instance Segmentation: State of the artcited by 85
  6. 2020Table Structure Recognition using Top-Down and Bottom-Up Cuescited by 53
  7. 2019CBNet: A Novel Composite Backbone Network Architecture for Object Detectioncited by 44
  8. 2021Current Status and Performance Analysis of Table Recognition in Document Images with Deep Neural Networkscited by 18
  9. 2021Guided Table Structure Recognition through Anchor Optimizationcited by 15

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.

1 paper.