mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Hierarchical Potential-based Reward Shaping from Task Specifications

arXiv 2110.02792 ↗First posted 6 Oct 2021cs.LG cs.AIcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The automatic synthesis of policies for robotic-control tasks through reinforcement learning relies on a reward signal that simultaneously captures many possibly conflicting requirements. In this paper, we in-tro-duce a novel, hierarchical, potential-based reward-shaping approach (HPRS) for defining effective, multivariate rewards for a large family of such control tasks. We formalize a task as a partially-ordered set of safety, target, and comfort requirements, and define an automated methodology to enforce a natural order among requirements and shape the associated reward. Building upon potential-based reward shaping, we show that HPRS preserves policy optimality. Our experimental evaluation demonstrates HPRS's superior ability in capturing the intended behavior, resulting in task-satisfying policies with improved comfort, and converging to optimal behavior faster than other state-of-the-art approaches. We demonstrate the practical usability of HPRS on several robotics applications and the smooth sim2real transition on two autonomous-driving scenarios for F1TENTH race cars.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Oct 2021.

Builds on

17 of 37 references.

References · 17

  1. 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,635
  2. 2015Continuous control with deep reinforcement learningcited by 3,279
  3. 2016Concrete Problems in AI Safetycited by 1,582
  4. 2017Domain Randomization for Transferring Deep Neural Networks from Simulation to the Real Worldcited by 1,401
  5. 2014A Survey of Multi-Objective Sequential Decision-Makingcited by 229
  6. 2016Reinforcement Learning With Temporal Logic Rewardscited by 114
  7. 2018Dynamic Weights in Multi-Objective Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 96
  8. 2021Compositional Reinforcement Learning from Logical Specificationscited by 65
  9. 2014Probably Approximately Correct MDP Learning and Control With Temporal Logic Constraintscited by 53
  10. 2019Liability, Ethics, and Culture-Aware Behavior Specification using Rulebookscited by 41
  11. 2020Temporal-Logic-Based Reward Shaping for Continuing Reinforcement Learning Taskscited by 28
  12. 2021Latent Imagination Facilitates Zero-Shot Transfer in Autonomous Racingcited by 22
5 more
  1. 2017A Policy Search Method For Temporal Logic Specified Reinforcement Learning Taskscited by 19
  2. 2020RTAMT: Online Robustness Monitors from STLcited by 19
  3. 2021Parallel and Multi-Objective Falsification with Scenic and VerifAIcited by 8
  4. 2015Temporal Logic as Filteringcited by 4
  5. 2015Robust Satisfaction of Temporal Logic Specifications via Reinforcement Learningcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 3; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

7 papers.