mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Step Towards Efficient Evaluation of Complex Perception Tasks in Simulation

arXiv 2110.02739 ↗First posted 28 Sep 2021cs.LG cs.AI cs.CVcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

There has been increasing interest in characterising the error behaviour of systems which contain deep learning models before deploying them into any safety-critical scenario. However, characterising such behaviour usually requires large-scale testing of the model that can be extremely computationally expensive for complex real-world tasks. For example, tasks involving compute intensive object detectors as one of their components. In this work, we propose an approach that enables efficient large-scale testing using simplified low-fidelity simulators and without the computational cost of executing expensive deep learning models. Our approach relies on designing an efficient surrogate model corresponding to the compute intensive components of the task under test. We demonstrate the efficacy of our methodology by evaluating the performance of an autonomous driving task in the Carla simulator with reduced computational expense by training efficient surrogate models for PIXOR and CenterPoint LiDAR detectors, whilst demonstrating that the accuracy of the simulation is maintained.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Sep 2021.

Builds on

24 of 46 references.

References · 24

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  3. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  4. 2017CARLA: An Open Urban Driving Simulatorcited by 2,431
  5. 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,335
  6. 2017Multi-Task Learning Using Uncertainty to Weigh Losses for Scene Geometry and Semanticscited by 1,345
  7. 2019Can You Trust Your Model's Uncertainty? Evaluating Predictive Uncertainty Under Dataset Shiftcited by 1,274
  8. 2020Center-based 3D Object Detection and Trackingcited by 1,143
  9. 2019EfficientDet: Scalable and Efficient Object Detectioncited by 1,018
  10. 2019Adversarial Examples Are Not Bugs, They Are Featurescited by 950
  11. 2018Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracycited by 873
  12. 2019PIXOR: Real-time 3D Object Detection from Point Cloudscited by 358
12 more
  1. 2020Calibrating Deep Neural Networks using Focal Losscited by 353
  2. 2017A Survey of Model Compression and Acceleration for Deep Neural Networkscited by 298
  3. 2016Driving in the Matrix: Can Virtual Worlds Replace Human-Generated Annotations for Real World Tasks?cited by 194
  4. 2017Computer Vision for Autonomous Vehicles: Problems, Datasets and State of the Artcited by 182
  5. 2021AdvSim: Generating Safety-Critical Scenarios for Self-Driving Vehiclescited by 132
  6. 2020A Survey of End-to-End Driving: Architectures and Training Methodscited by 123
  7. 2020A Survey of Algorithms for Black-Box Safety Validation of Cyber-Physical Systemscited by 71
  8. 2020Learning to Evaluate Perception Models Using Planner-Centric Metricscited by 49
  9. 2020Neural Bridge Sampling for Evaluating Safety-Critical Autonomous Systemscited by 34
  10. 2019Sim2Real Predictivity: Does Evaluation in Simulation Predict Real-World Performance?cited by 25
  11. 2019LiDAR Sensor modeling and Data augmentation with GANs for Autonomous drivingcited by 22
  12. 2020A Study on the Challenges of Using Robotics Simulators for Testingcited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 1.

4 papers.