Multi-Task and Multi-Corpora Training Strategies to Enhance Argumentative Sentence Linking Performance
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Argumentative structure prediction aims to establish links between textual units and label the relationship between them, forming a structured representation for a given input text. The former task, linking, has been identified by earlier works as particularly challenging, as it requires finding the most appropriate structure out of a very large search space of possible link combinations. In this paper, we improve a state-of-the-art linking model by using multi-task and multi-corpora training strategies. Our auxiliary tasks help the model to learn the role of each sentence in the argumentative structure. Combining multi-corpora training with a selective sampling strategy increases the training data size while ensuring that the model still learns the desired target distribution well. Experiments on essays written by English-as-a-foreign-language learners show that both strategies significantly improve the model's performance; for instance, we observe a 15.8% increase in the F1-macro for individual link predictions.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Sep 2021.
Builds on
14 of 42 references.
References · 14
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
- 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
- 2021A Survey of Data Augmentation Approaches for NLPcited by 408
- 2018AllenNLP: A Deep Semantic Natural Language Processing Platformcited by 347
- 2016Deep Biaffine Attention for Neural Dependency Parsingcited by 334
- 2016Parsing Argumentation Structures in Persuasive Essayscited by 99
- 2018Cross-topic Argument Mining from Heterogeneous Sources Using Attention-based Neural Networkscited by 58
- 2017Neural End-to-End Learning for Computational Argumentation Miningcited by 41
- 2017What is the Essence of a Claim? Cross-Domain Claim Identificationcited by 31
- 2020Transformer-Based Models for Automatic Identification of Argument Relations: A Cross-Domain Evaluationcited by 20
- 2018Multi-Task Learning for Argumentation Mining in Low-Resource Settingscited by 10
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1.
2 papers.