Tackling Inter-Class Similarity and Intra-Class Variance for Microscopic Image-based Classification
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Automatic classification of aquatic microorganisms is based on the morphological features extracted from individual images. The current works on their classification do not consider the inter-class similarity and intra-class variance that causes misclassification. We are particularly interested in the case where variance within a class occurs due to discrete visual changes in microscopic images. In this paper, we propose to account for it by partitioning the classes with high variance based on the visual features. Our algorithm automatically decides the optimal number of sub-classes to be created and consider each of them as a separate class for training. This way, the network learns finer-grained visual features. Our experiments on two databases of freshwater benthic diatoms and marine plankton show that our method can outperform the state-of-the-art approaches for classification of these aquatic microorganisms.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Sep 2021.
Builds on
6 of 20 references.
References · 6
- 2015FaceNet: A Unified Embedding for Face Recognition and Clusteringcited by 2,849
- 2017Beyond triplet loss: a deep quadruplet network for person re-identificationcited by 172
- 2015WHOI-Plankton- A Large Scale Fine Grained Visual Recognition Benchmark Dataset for Plankton Classificationcited by 18
- 2017Incorporating Intra-Class Variance to Fine-Grained Visual Recognitioncited by 11
- 2019Deep learning for Plankton and Coral Classificationcited by 6
- 2019On Intra-Class Variance for Deep Learning of Classifierscited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 4; 2024: 0; 2025: 2.
6 papers.
- 2023Gaussian Latent Representations for Uncertainty Estimation using Mahalanobis Distance in Deep Classifierscited by 10
- 2025Probabilistic Embeddings for Frozen Vision-Language Models: Uncertainty Quantification with Gaussian Process Latent Variable Modelscited by 9
- 2023Survey of Automatic Plankton Image Recognition: Challenges, Existing Solutions and Future Perspectivescited by 6
- 2023Beyond Accuracy: Statistical Measures and Benchmark for Evaluation of Representation from Self-Supervised Learningcited by 3
- 2023How To Overcome Confirmation Bias in Semi-Supervised Image Classification By Active Learningcited by 2
- 2025Evaluating and Enhancing Segmentation Model Robustness with Metamorphic Testingcited by 0
- 2025Probabilistic Embeddings for Frozen Vision-Language Models: Uncertainty Quantification with Gaussian Process Latent Variable Models8 May 2025
- 2025Evaluating and Enhancing Segmentation Model Robustness with Metamorphic Testing3 Apr 2025
- 2023Beyond Accuracy: Statistical Measures and Benchmark for Evaluation of Representation from Self-Supervised Learning2 Dec 2023
- 2023How To Overcome Confirmation Bias in Semi-Supervised Image Classification By Active Learning16 Aug 2023
- 2023Gaussian Latent Representations for Uncertainty Estimation using Mahalanobis Distance in Deep Classifiers23 May 2023
- 2023Survey of Automatic Plankton Image Recognition: Challenges, Existing Solutions and Future Perspectives19 May 2023