mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Pushing the Right Buttons: Adversarial Evaluation of Quality Estimation

arXiv 2109.10859 ↗First posted 22 Sep 2021cs.CL cs.AIcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Current Machine Translation (MT) systems achieve very good results on a growing variety of language pairs and datasets. However, they are known to produce fluent translation outputs that can contain important meaning errors, thus undermining their reliability in practice. Quality Estimation (QE) is the task of automatically assessing the performance of MT systems at test time. Thus, in order to be useful, QE systems should be able to detect such errors. However, this ability is yet to be tested in the current evaluation practices, where QE systems are assessed only in terms of their correlation with human judgements. In this work, we bridge this gap by proposing a general methodology for adversarial testing of QE for MT. First, we show that despite a high correlation with human judgements achieved by the recent SOTA, certain types of meaning errors are still problematic for QE to detect. Second, we show that on average, the ability of a given model to discriminate between meaning-preserving and meaning-altering perturbations is predictive of its overall performance, thus potentially allowing for comparing QE systems without relying on manual quality annotation.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Sep 2021.

Builds on

13 of 33 references.

References · 13

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
  3. 2019Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at Scalecited by 3,907
  4. 2019fairseq: A Fast, Extensible Toolkit for Sequence Modelingcited by 1,486
  5. 2020Beyond Accuracy: Behavioral Testing of NLP models with CheckListcited by 979
  6. 2017Synthetic and Natural Noise Both Break Neural Machine Translationcited by 304
  7. 2020Unsupervised Quality Estimation for Neural Machine Translationcited by 210
  8. 2018Contextual Augmentation: Data Augmentation by Words with Paradigmatic Relationscited by 201
  9. 2018On the Impact of Various Types of Noise on Neural Machine Translationcited by 76
  10. 2020TransQuest: Translation Quality Estimation with Cross-lingual Transformerscited by 59
  11. 2019OpenKiwi: An Open Source Framework for Quality Estimationcited by 49
  12. 2019Findings of the First Shared Task on Machine Translation Robustnesscited by 17
1 more
  1. 2020Revisiting Robust Neural Machine Translation: A Transformer Case Studycited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 1.

4 papers.