mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

BabelCalib: A Universal Approach to Calibrating Central Cameras

arXiv 2109.09704 ↗First posted 20 Sep 2021cs.CVcited by 14

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Existing calibration methods occasionally fail for large field-of-view cameras due to the non-linearity of the underlying problem and the lack of good initial values for all parameters of the used camera model. This might occur because a simpler projection model is assumed in an initial step, or a poor initial guess for the internal parameters is pre-defined. A lot of the difficulties of general camera calibration lie in the use of a forward projection model. We side-step these challenges by first proposing a solver to calibrate the parameters in terms of a back-projection model and then regress the parameters for a target forward model. These steps are incorporated in a robust estimation framework to cope with outlying detections. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our approach is very reliable and returns the most accurate calibration parameters as measured on the downstream task of absolute pose estimation on test sets. The code is released at https://github.com/ylochman/babelcalib.

Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Sep 2021.

Builds on

5 of 45 references.

References · 5

  1. 2018The TUM VI Benchmark for Evaluating Visual-Inertial Odometrycited by 94
  2. 2018The Double Sphere Camera Modelcited by 50
  3. 2019Why Having 10,000 Parameters in Your Camera Model is Better Than Twelvecited by 43
  4. 2020Minimal Solvers for Single-View Lens-Distorted Camera Auto-Calibrationcited by 13
  5. 2019Minimal Solvers for Rectifying from Radially-Distorted Conjugate Translationscited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 5; 2026: 5.

14 papers.

Sort: