Greedy UnMixing for Q-Learning in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper introduces Greedy UnMix (GUM) for cooperative multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL). Greedy UnMix aims to avoid scenarios where MARL methods fail due to overestimation of values as part of the large joint state-action space. It aims to address this through a conservative Q-learning approach through restricting the state-marginal in the dataset to avoid unobserved joint state action spaces, whilst concurrently attempting to unmix or simplify the problem space under the centralized training with decentralized execution paradigm. We demonstrate the adherence to Q-function lower bounds in the Q-learning for MARL scenarios, and demonstrate superior performance to existing Q-learning MARL approaches as well as more general MARL algorithms over a set of benchmark MARL tasks, despite its relative simplicity compared with state-of-the-art approaches.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Sep 2021.
Builds on
19 of 26 references.
References · 19
- 2015Continuous control with deep reinforcement learningcited by 3,279
- 2016Categorical Reparameterization with Gumbel-Softmaxcited by 2,708
- 2020Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,777
- 2017Multi-Agent Actor-Critic for Mixed Cooperative-Competitive Environmentscited by 1,519
- 2018Off-Policy Deep Reinforcement Learning without Explorationcited by 1,227
- 2016The Concrete Distribution: A Continuous Relaxation of Discrete Random Variablescited by 1,135
- 2019Stabilizing Off-Policy Q-Learning via Bootstrapping Error Reductioncited by 833
- 2018QMIX: Monotonic Value Function Factorisation for Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 697
- 2017Distributional Reinforcement Learning with Quantile Regressioncited by 464
- 2019QTRAN: Learning to Factorize with Transformation for Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 372
- 2020PettingZoo: Gym for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 209
- 2017Safe Policy Improvement with Baseline Bootstrappingcited by 141
7 more
- 2016Why is Posterior Sampling Better than Optimism for Reinforcement Learning?cited by 116
- 2020Shared Experience Actor-Critic for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 114
- 2019Benchmarking Batch Deep Reinforcement Learning Algorithmscited by 108
- 2016AdaNet: Adaptive Structural Learning of Artificial Neural Networkscited by 54
- 2016Safe Policy Improvement by Minimizing Robust Baseline Regretcited by 51
- 2020Learning Implicit Credit Assignment for Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 10
- 2019Residual Networks Behave Like Boosting Algorithmscited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.
1 paper.