Adversarial Mixing Policy for Relaxing Locally Linear Constraints in Mixup
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Mixup is a recent regularizer for current deep classification networks. Through training a neural network on convex combinations of pairs of examples and their labels, it imposes locally linear constraints on the model's input space. However, such strict linear constraints often lead to under-fitting which degrades the effects of regularization. Noticeably, this issue is getting more serious when the resource is extremely limited. To address these issues, we propose the Adversarial Mixing Policy (AMP), organized in a min-max-rand formulation, to relax the Locally Linear Constraints in Mixup. Specifically, AMP adds a small adversarial perturbation to the mixing coefficients rather than the examples. Thus, slight non-linearity is injected in-between the synthetic examples and synthetic labels. By training on these data, the deep networks are further regularized, and thus achieve a lower predictive error rate. Experiments on five text classification benchmarks and five backbone models have empirically shown that our methods reduce the error rate over Mixup variants in a significant margin (up to 31.3%), especially in low-resource conditions (up to 17.5%).
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Sep 2021.
Builds on
28 of 43 references.
References · 28
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
- 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 6,979
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
- 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
- 2019MixMatch: A Holistic Approach to Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,390
- 2014Convolutional Neural Networks for Sentence Classificationcited by 1,124
- 2017Virtual Adversarial Training: A Regularization Method for Supervised and Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 918
- 2018Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracycited by 873
16 more
- 2019EDA: Easy Data Augmentation Techniques for Boosting Performance on Text Classification Taskscited by 800
- 2019ReMixMatch: Semi-Supervised Learning with Distribution Alignment and Augmentation Anchoringcited by 349
- 2016Adversarial Training Methods for Semi-Supervised Text Classificationcited by 280
- 2019Adversarial Domain Adaptation with Domain Mixupcited by 250
- 2018MixUp as Locally Linear Out-Of-Manifold Regularizationcited by 158
- 2019Augmenting Data with Mixup for Sentence Classification: An Empirical Studycited by 125
- 2020Adversarial Vertex Mixup: Toward Better Adversarially Robust Generalizationcited by 73
- 2018Data augmentation instead of explicit regularizationcited by 62
- 2015Distributional Smoothing with Virtual Adversarial Trainingcited by 61
- 2019Mixup Inference: Better Exploiting Mixup to Defend Adversarial Attackscited by 54
- 2020SeqMix: Augmenting Active Sequence Labeling via Sequence Mixupcited by 52
- 2019Fine-grained Sentiment Classification using BERTcited by 38
- 2019Virtual Mixup Training for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 21
- 2019MetaMixUp: Learning Adaptive Interpolation Policy of MixUp with Meta-Learningcited by 21
- 2020Mixup-Transformer: Dynamic Data Augmentation for NLP Taskscited by 15
- 2019MixUp as Directional Adversarial Trainingcited by 14
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
3 papers.