Towards Zero-shot Commonsense Reasoning with Self-supervised Refinement of Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Can we get existing language models and refine them for zero-shot commonsense reasoning? This paper presents an initial study exploring the feasibility of zero-shot commonsense reasoning for the Winograd Schema Challenge by formulating the task as self-supervised refinement of a pre-trained language model. In contrast to previous studies that rely on fine-tuning annotated datasets, we seek to boost conceptualization via loss landscape refinement. To this end, we propose a novel self-supervised learning approach that refines the language model utilizing a set of linguistic perturbations of similar concept relationships. Empirical analysis of our conceptually simple framework demonstrates the viability of zero-shot commonsense reasoning on multiple benchmarks.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Sep 2021.
Builds on
20 of 30 references.
References · 20
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
- 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
- 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,482
- 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
- 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,712
- 2018Gender Bias in Coreference Resolution: Evaluation and Debiasing Methodscited by 657
- 2018Gender Bias in Coreference Resolutioncited by 438
- 2019Unmasking Clever Hans Predictors and Assessing What Machines Really Learncited by 359
- 2020The Next Decade in AI: Four Steps Towards Robust Artificial Intelligencecited by 194
- 2018Robustness via curvature regularization, and vice versacited by 174
- 2019Adversarial Robustness through Local Linearizationcited by 146
8 more
- 2019A Surprisingly Robust Trick for Winograd Schema Challengecited by 30
- 2020A Review of Winograd Schema Challenge Datasets and Approachescited by 27
- 2020Contrastive Self-Supervised Learning for Commonsense Reasoningcited by 25
- 2020The Sensitivity of Language Models and Humans to Winograd Schema Perturbationscited by 21
- 2018How Reasonable are Common-Sense Reasoning Tasks: A Case-Study on the Winograd Schema Challenge and SWAGcited by 18
- 2020Do Fine-tuned Commonsense Language Models Really Generalize?cited by 8
- 2020Precise Task Formalization Matters in Winograd Schema Evaluationscited by 7
- 2018A Simple Machine Learning Method for Commonsense Reasoning? A Short Commentary on Trinh & Le (2018)cited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 3.
4 papers.
- 2023ChatGPT is a Knowledgeable but Inexperienced Solver: An Investigation of Commonsense Problem in Large Language Modelscited by 63
- 2022minicons: Enabling Flexible Behavioral and Representational Analyses of Transformer Language Modelscited by 58
- 2023Commonsense Knowledge Transfer for Pre-trained Language Modelscited by 5
- 2023CASE: Commonsense-Augmented Score with an Expanded Answer Spacecited by 0
- 2023CASE: Commonsense-Augmented Score with an Expanded Answer Space3 Nov 2023
- 2023Commonsense Knowledge Transfer for Pre-trained Language Models4 Jun 2023
- 2023ChatGPT is a Knowledgeable but Inexperienced Solver: An Investigation of Commonsense Problem in Large Language Models29 Mar 2023
- 2022minicons: Enabling Flexible Behavioral and Representational Analyses of Transformer Language Models24 Mar 2022