Iterated Vector Fields and Conservatism, with Applications to Federated Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We study whether iterated vector fields (vector fields composed with themselves) are conservative. We give explicit examples of vector fields for which this self-composition preserves conservatism. Notably, this includes gradient vector fields of loss functions associated with some generalized linear models. As we show, characterizing the set of vector fields satisfying this condition leads to non-trivial geometric questions. In the context of federated learning, we show that when clients have loss functions whose gradients satisfy this condition, federated averaging is equivalent to gradient descent on a surrogate loss function. We leverage this to derive novel convergence results for federated learning. By contrast, we demonstrate that when the client losses violate this property, federated averaging can yield behavior which is fundamentally distinct from centralized optimization. Finally, we discuss theoretical and practical questions our analytical framework raises for federated learning.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Sep 2021.
Builds on
14 of 25 references.
References · 14
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
- 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,021
- 2019Federated Learning: Challenges, Methods, and Future Directionscited by 1,531
- 2020Adaptive Federated Optimizationcited by 1,036
- 2019Measuring the Effects of Non-Identical Data Distribution for Federated Visual Classificationcited by 836
- 2019Towards Federated Learning at Scale: System Designcited by 826
- 2014Convex Optimization: Algorithms and Complexitycited by 569
- 2016Linear Convergence of Gradient and Proximal-Gradient Methods Under the Polyak-Lojasiewicz Conditioncited by 526
- 2021A Field Guide to Federated Optimizationcited by 312
- 2020FedSplit: An algorithmic framework for fast federated optimizationcited by 108
- 2019First Analysis of Local GD on Heterogeneous Datacited by 80
- 2020From Local SGD to Local Fixed-Point Methods for Federated Learningcited by 74
2 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 3; 2024: 0; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
8 papers.
- 2022On the Unreasonable Effectiveness of Federated Averaging with Heterogeneous Datacited by 36
- 2023Towards Federated Foundation Models: Scalable Dataset Pipelines for Group-Structured Learningcited by 29
- 2025Communication-Efficient Language Model Training Scales Reliably and Robustly: Scaling Laws for DiLoCocited by 23
- 2023Leveraging Function Space Aggregation for Federated Learning at Scalecited by 4
- 2023Federated Automatic Differentiationcited by 2
- 2025On The Hidden Biases of Flow Matching Samplerscited by 2
- 2026High dimensional theory of two-phase optimizerscited by 1
- 2026Outer-Momentum Restarting in High-Dimensional Two-Phase Optimizationcited by 0
- 2026Outer-Momentum Restarting in High-Dimensional Two-Phase Optimization27 May 2026
- 2026High dimensional theory of two-phase optimizers27 Mar 2026
- 2025On The Hidden Biases of Flow Matching Samplers18 Dec 2025
- 2025Communication-Efficient Language Model Training Scales Reliably and Robustly: Scaling Laws for DiLoCo12 Mar 2025
- 2023Leveraging Function Space Aggregation for Federated Learning at Scale17 Nov 2023
- 2023Towards Federated Foundation Models: Scalable Dataset Pipelines for Group-Structured Learning18 Jul 2023
- 2023Federated Automatic Differentiation18 Jan 2023
- 2022On the Unreasonable Effectiveness of Federated Averaging with Heterogeneous Data9 Jun 2022