mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Sparsity and Sentence Structure in Encoder-Decoder Attention of Summarization Systems

arXiv 2109.03888 ↗First posted 8 Sep 2021cs.CLcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Transformer models have achieved state-of-the-art results in a wide range of NLP tasks including summarization. Training and inference using large transformer models can be computationally expensive. Previous work has focused on one important bottleneck, the quadratic self-attention mechanism in the encoder. Modified encoder architectures such as LED or LoBART use local attention patterns to address this problem for summarization. In contrast, this work focuses on the transformer's encoder-decoder attention mechanism. The cost of this attention becomes more significant in inference or training approaches that require model-generated histories. First, we examine the complexity of the encoder-decoder attention. We demonstrate empirically that there is a sparse sentence structure in document summarization that can be exploited by constraining the attention mechanism to a subset of input sentences, whilst maintaining system performance. Second, we propose a modified architecture that selects the subset of sentences to constrain the encoder-decoder attention. Experiments are carried out on abstractive summarization tasks, including CNN/DailyMail, XSum, Spotify Podcast, and arXiv.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Sep 2021.

Builds on

23 of 29 references.

References · 23

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  3. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  4. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  5. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
  6. 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,893
  7. 2014Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translationcited by 4,057
  8. 2020Longformer: The Long-Document Transformercited by 3,413
  9. 2020Big Bird: Transformers for Longer Sequencescited by 1,684
  10. 2016Google's Neural Machine Translation System: Bridging the Gap between Human and Machine Translationcited by 1,475
  11. 2018Don't Give Me the Details, Just the Summary! Topic-Aware Convolutional Neural Networks for Extreme Summarizationcited by 1,317
  12. 2015Teaching Machines to Read and Comprehendcited by 1,049
11 more
  1. 2019What Does BERT Look At? An Analysis of BERT's Attentioncited by 1,003
  2. 2019Analyzing Multi-Head Self-Attention: Specialized Heads Do the Heavy Lifting, the Rest Can Be Prunedcited by 856
  3. 2015Scheduled Sampling for Sequence Prediction with Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 803
  4. 2020Efficient Transformers: A Surveycited by 790
  5. 2018A Discourse-Aware Attention Model for Abstractive Summarization of Long Documentscited by 478
  6. 2021Efficient Attentions for Long Document Summarizationcited by 345
  7. 2018Bottom-Up Abstractive Summarizationcited by 177
  8. 2018A Unified Model for Extractive and Abstractive Summarization using Inconsistency Losscited by 47
  9. 2021Long-Span Summarization via Local Attention and Content Selectioncited by 24
  10. 2021TREC 2020 Podcasts Track Overviewcited by 13
  11. 2021Attention Head Masking for Inference Time Content Selection in Abstractive Summarizationcited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 1.

3 papers.