mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Learn2Agree: Fitting with Multiple Annotators without Objective Ground Truth

arXiv 2109.03596 ↗First posted 8 Sep 2021cs.LG cs.HCcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The annotation of domain experts is important for some medical applications where the objective ground truth is ambiguous to define, e.g., the rehabilitation for some chronic diseases, and the prescreening of some musculoskeletal abnormalities without further medical examinations. However, improper uses of the annotations may hinder developing reliable models. On one hand, forcing the use of a single ground truth generated from multiple annotations is less informative for the modeling. On the other hand, feeding the model with all the annotations without proper regularization is noisy given existing disagreements. For such issues, we propose a novel Learning to Agreement (Learn2Agree) framework to tackle the challenge of learning from multiple annotators without objective ground truth. The framework has two streams, with one stream fitting with the multiple annotators and the other stream learning agreement information between annotators. In particular, the agreement learning stream produces regularization information to the classifier stream, tuning its decision to be better in line with the agreement between annotators. The proposed method can be easily added to existing backbones, with experiments on two medical datasets showed better agreement levels with annotators.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Sep 2021.

Builds on

16 of 48 references.

References · 16

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,093
  2. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,707
  3. 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,902
  4. 2019Class-Balanced Loss Based on Effective Number of Samplescited by 1,243
  5. 2020Generalized Focal Loss: Learning Qualified and Distributed Bounding Boxes for Dense Object Detectioncited by 408
  6. 2015Bayesian SegNet: Model Uncertainty in Deep Convolutional Encoder-Decoder Architectures for Scene Understandingcited by 218
  7. 2019Deep learning with noisy labels: exploring techniques and remedies in medical image analysiscited by 173
  8. 2020Posterior Network: Uncertainty Estimation without OOD Samples via Density-Based Pseudo-Countscited by 164
  9. 2019Learning From Noisy Labels By Regularized Estimation Of Annotator Confusioncited by 126
  10. 2020Generalized Focal Loss V2: Learning Reliable Localization Quality Estimation for Dense Object Detectioncited by 104
  11. 2017Who Said What: Modeling Individual Labelers Improves Classificationcited by 77
  12. 2019Sampling-free Epistemic Uncertainty Estimation Using Approximated Variance Propagationcited by 74
4 more
  1. 2020Disentangling Human Error from the Ground Truth in Segmentation of Medical Imagescited by 58
  2. 2017Multi-View Deep Learning for Consistent Semantic Mapping with RGB-D Camerascited by 28
  3. 2013An Empirical Study into Annotator Agreement, Ground Truth Estimation, and Algorithm Evaluationcited by 15
  4. 2020Leveraging Activity Recognition to Enable Protective Behavior Detection in Continuous Datacited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.