mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Investigating Vulnerabilities of Deep Neural Policies

arXiv 2108.13093 ↗First posted 30 Aug 2021cs.LG cs.AI cs.CVcited by 15

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Reinforcement learning policies based on deep neural networks are vulnerable to imperceptible adversarial perturbations to their inputs, in much the same way as neural network image classifiers. Recent work has proposed several methods to improve the robustness of deep reinforcement learning agents to adversarial perturbations based on training in the presence of these imperceptible perturbations (i.e. adversarial training). In this paper, we study the effects of adversarial training on the neural policy learned by the agent. In particular, we follow two distinct parallel approaches to investigate the outcomes of adversarial training on deep neural policies based on worst-case distributional shift and feature sensitivity. For the first approach, we compare the Fourier spectrum of minimal perturbations computed for both adversarially trained and vanilla trained neural policies. Via experiments in the OpenAI Atari environments we show that minimal perturbations computed for adversarially trained policies are more focused on lower frequencies in the Fourier domain, indicating a higher sensitivity of these policies to low frequency perturbations. For the second approach, we propose a novel method to measure the feature sensitivities of deep neural policies and we compare these feature sensitivity differences in state-of-the-art adversarially trained deep neural policies and vanilla trained deep neural policies. We believe our results can be an initial step towards understanding the relationship between adversarial training and different notions of robustness for neural policies.

Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Aug 2021.

Builds on

19 of 29 references.

References · 19

  1. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  2. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  3. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  4. 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
  5. 2014Sequence to Sequence Learning with Neural Networkscited by 2,974
  6. 2016Adversarial examples in the physical worldcited by 1,762
  7. 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,510
  8. 2018Obfuscated Gradients Give a False Sense of Security: Circumventing Defenses to Adversarial Examplescited by 1,259
  9. 2015Dueling Network Architectures for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 769
  10. 2018QT-Opt: Scalable Deep Reinforcement Learning for Vision-Based Robotic Manipulationcited by 730
  11. 2017Robust Adversarial Reinforcement Learningcited by 439
  12. 2014Deep Speech: Scaling up end-to-end speech recognitioncited by 354
7 more
  1. 2017Adversarial Attacks on Neural Network Policiescited by 314
  2. 2020Robust Deep Reinforcement Learning against Adversarial Perturbations on State Observationscited by 235
  3. 2019Adversarial Policies: Attacking Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 209
  4. 2017Delving into adversarial attacks on deep policiescited by 104
  5. 2019On the Hardness of Robust Classificationcited by 23
  6. 2018Deep Reinforcement Learning for Surgical Gesture Segmentation and Classificationcited by 15
  7. 2019Empirically Measuring Concentration: Fundamental Limits on Intrinsic Robustnesscited by 12

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 3; 2023: 6; 2024: 4; 2025: 1.

15 papers.

Sort:

By area: