Scheduled Sampling Based on Decoding Steps for Neural Machine Translation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Scheduled sampling is widely used to mitigate the exposure bias problem for neural machine translation. Its core motivation is to simulate the inference scene during training by replacing ground-truth tokens with predicted tokens, thus bridging the gap between training and inference. However, vanilla scheduled sampling is merely based on training steps and equally treats all decoding steps. Namely, it simulates an inference scene with uniform error rates, which disobeys the real inference scene, where larger decoding steps usually have higher error rates due to error accumulations. To alleviate the above discrepancy, we propose scheduled sampling methods based on decoding steps, increasing the selection chance of predicted tokens with the growth of decoding steps. Consequently, we can more realistically simulate the inference scene during training, thus better bridging the gap between training and inference. Moreover, we investigate scheduled sampling based on both training steps and decoding steps for further improvements. Experimentally, our approaches significantly outperform the Transformer baseline and vanilla scheduled sampling on three large-scale WMT tasks. Additionally, our approaches also generalize well to the text summarization task on two popular benchmarks.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Aug 2021.
Builds on
29 of 37 references.
References · 29
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,548
- 2014Sequence to Sequence Learning with Neural Networkscited by 2,986
- 2015Neural Machine Translation of Rare Words with Subword Unitscited by 2,918
- 2017Get To The Point: Summarization with Pointer-Generator Networkscited by 1,292
- 2019PEGASUS: Pre-training with Extracted Gap-sentences for Abstractive Summarizationcited by 1,102
- 2015Scheduled Sampling for Sequence Prediction with Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 803
- 2019Unified Language Model Pre-training for Natural Language Understanding and Generationcited by 670
- 2015Sequence Level Training with Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 576
- 2016Self-critical Sequence Training for Image Captioningcited by 547
- 2015A Neural Attention Model for Abstractive Sentence Summarizationcited by 396
- 2019MASS: Masked Sequence to Sequence Pre-training for Language Generationcited by 347
17 more
- 2020ProphetNet: Predicting Future N-gram for Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-trainingcited by 222
- 2019Leveraging Pre-trained Checkpoints for Sequence Generation Taskscited by 182
- 2020Better Fine-Tuning by Reducing Representational Collapsecited by 157
- 2016Sequence-to-Sequence Learning as Beam-Search Optimizationcited by 127
- 2019Bridging the Gap between Training and Inference for Neural Machine Translationcited by 123
- 2015Minimum Risk Training for Neural Machine Translationcited by 115
- 2019Scheduled Sampling for Transformerscited by 48
- 2018No Metrics Are Perfect: Adversarial Reward Learning for Visual Storytellingcited by 46
- 2020ERNIE-GEN: An Enhanced Multi-Flow Pre-training and Fine-tuning Framework for Natural Language Generationcited by 40
- 2019Synchronous Bidirectional Neural Machine Translationcited by 27
- 2019Parallel Scheduled Samplingcited by 17
- 2017Differentiable Scheduled Sampling for Credit Assignmentcited by 13
- 2020WeChat Neural Machine Translation Systems for WMT20cited by 11
- 2021WeChat Neural Machine Translation Systems for WMT21cited by 11
- 2019Synchronous Bidirectional Inference for Neural Sequence Generationcited by 10
- 2021Confidence-Aware Scheduled Sampling for Neural Machine Translationcited by 10
- 2020TeaForN: Teacher-Forcing with N-gramscited by 9
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 4; 2023: 6; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.
11 papers.
- 2022Rethinking Symbolic Regression Datasets and Benchmarks for Scientific Discoverycited by 46
- 2022Reducing Position Bias in Simultaneous Machine Translation with Length-Aware Frameworkcited by 16
- 2023A Systematic Study of Knowledge Distillation for Natural Language Generation with Pseudo-Target Trainingcited by 16
- 2023Towards Understanding and Improving Knowledge Distillation for Neural Machine Translationcited by 10
- 2022Conditional Bilingual Mutual Information Based Adaptive Training for Neural Machine Translationcited by 6
- 2023Solving Math Word Problems with Reexaminationcited by 2
- 2025GenTSE: Enhancing Target Speaker Extraction via a Coarse-to-Fine Generative Language Modelcited by 1
- 2022Towards Robust Online Dialogue Response Generationcited by 0
- 2023Dynamic Scheduled Sampling with Imitation Loss for Neural Text Generationcited by 0
- 2023Bilevel Scheduled Sampling for Dialogue Generationcited by 0
- 2023Guiding AMR Parsing with Reverse Graph Linearizationcited by 0
- 2025GenTSE: Enhancing Target Speaker Extraction via a Coarse-to-Fine Generative Language Model24 Dec 2025
- 2023Solving Math Word Problems with Reexamination14 Oct 2023
- 2023Guiding AMR Parsing with Reverse Graph Linearization13 Oct 2023
- 2023Bilevel Scheduled Sampling for Dialogue Generation5 Sep 2023
- 2023Towards Understanding and Improving Knowledge Distillation for Neural Machine Translation14 May 2023
- 2023A Systematic Study of Knowledge Distillation for Natural Language Generation with Pseudo-Target Training3 May 2023
- 2023Dynamic Scheduled Sampling with Imitation Loss for Neural Text Generation31 Jan 2023
- 2022Rethinking Symbolic Regression Datasets and Benchmarks for Scientific Discovery21 Jun 2022
- 2022Reducing Position Bias in Simultaneous Machine Translation with Length-Aware Framework17 Mar 2022
- 2022Towards Robust Online Dialogue Response Generation7 Mar 2022
- 2022Conditional Bilingual Mutual Information Based Adaptive Training for Neural Machine Translation6 Mar 2022