mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Confidence-Aware Scheduled Sampling for Neural Machine Translation

arXiv 2107.10427 ↗First posted 22 Jul 2021cs.CLcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Scheduled sampling is an effective method to alleviate the exposure bias problem of neural machine translation. It simulates the inference scene by randomly replacing ground-truth target input tokens with predicted ones during training. Despite its success, its critical schedule strategies are merely based on training steps, ignoring the real-time model competence, which limits its potential performance and convergence speed. To address this issue, we propose confidence-aware scheduled sampling. Specifically, we quantify real-time model competence by the confidence of model predictions, based on which we design fine-grained schedule strategies. In this way, the model is exactly exposed to predicted tokens for high-confidence positions and still ground-truth tokens for low-confidence positions. Moreover, we observe vanilla scheduled sampling suffers from degenerating into the original teacher forcing mode since most predicted tokens are the same as ground-truth tokens. Therefore, under the above confidence-aware strategy, we further expose more noisy tokens (e.g., wordy and incorrect word order) instead of predicted ones for high-confidence token positions. We evaluate our approach on the Transformer and conduct experiments on large-scale WMT 2014 English-German, WMT 2014 English-French, and WMT 2019 Chinese-English. Results show that our approach significantly outperforms the Transformer and vanilla scheduled sampling on both translation quality and convergence speed.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Jul 2021.

Builds on

29 of 43 references.

References · 29

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  3. 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,548
  4. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,448
  5. 2014Sequence to Sequence Learning with Neural Networkscited by 2,986
  6. 2015Neural Machine Translation of Rare Words with Subword Unitscited by 2,918
  7. 2015Scheduled Sampling for Sequence Prediction with Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 803
  8. 2015Sequence Level Training with Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 576
  9. 2016Self-critical Sequence Training for Image Captioningcited by 547
  10. 2019Learning Deep Transformer Models for Machine Translationcited by 309
  11. 2018Analyzing Uncertainty in Neural Machine Translationcited by 126
  12. 2019Bridging the Gap between Training and Inference for Neural Machine Translationcited by 123
17 more
  1. 2015Minimum Risk Training for Neural Machine Translationcited by 115
  2. 2019Calibration of Encoder Decoder Models for Neural Machine Translationcited by 68
  3. 2020On the Inference Calibration of Neural Machine Translationcited by 61
  4. 2019Scheduled Sampling for Transformerscited by 48
  5. 2018No Metrics Are Perfect: Adversarial Reward Learning for Visual Storytellingcited by 46
  6. 2019Improving Back-Translation with Uncertainty-based Confidence Estimationcited by 34
  7. 2019Synchronous Bidirectional Neural Machine Translationcited by 27
  8. 2020Self-Paced Learning for Neural Machine Translationcited by 27
  9. 2020Dynamic Data Selection and Weighting for Iterative Back-Translationcited by 25
  10. 2019Parallel Scheduled Samplingcited by 17
  11. 2020Data Rejuvenation: Exploiting Inactive Training Examples for Neural Machine Translationcited by 17
  12. 2017Differentiable Scheduled Sampling for Credit Assignmentcited by 13
  13. 2020Uncertainty-Aware Semantic Augmentation for Neural Machine Translationcited by 13
  14. 2020WeChat Neural Machine Translation Systems for WMT20cited by 11
  15. 2019Synchronous Bidirectional Inference for Neural Sequence Generationcited by 10
  16. 2020TeaForN: Teacher-Forcing with N-gramscited by 9
  17. 2019Hard but Robust, Easy but Sensitive: How Encoder and Decoder Perform in Neural Machine Translationcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 3; 2023: 4; 2024: 1.

10 papers.