mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Behind the Scenes: An Exploration of Trigger Biases Problem in Few-Shot Event Classification

arXiv 2108.12844 ↗First posted 29 Aug 2021cs.CLcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Few-Shot Event Classification (FSEC) aims at developing a model for event prediction, which can generalize to new event types with a limited number of annotated data. Existing FSEC studies have achieved high accuracy on different benchmarks. However, we find they suffer from trigger biases that signify the statistical homogeneity between some trigger words and target event types, which we summarize as trigger overlapping and trigger separability. The biases can result in context-bypassing problem, i.e., correct classifications can be gained by looking at only the trigger words while ignoring the entire context. Therefore, existing models can be weak in generalizing to unseen data in real scenarios. To further uncover the trigger biases and assess the generalization ability of the models, we propose two new sampling methods, Trigger-Uniform Sampling (TUS) and COnfusion Sampling (COS), for the meta tasks construction during evaluation. Besides, to cope with the context-bypassing problem in FSEC models, we introduce adversarial training and trigger reconstruction techniques. Experiments show these techniques help not only improve the performance, but also enhance the generalization ability of models.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Aug 2021.

Builds on

24 of 37 references.

References · 24

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  3. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  4. 2017Prototypical Networks for Few-shot Learningcited by 3,001
  5. 2016Making the V in VQA Matter: Elevating the Role of Image Understanding in Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,498
  6. 2019Right for the Wrong Reasons: Diagnosing Syntactic Heuristics in Natural Language Inferencecited by 864
  7. 2018Annotation Artifacts in Natural Language Inference Datacited by 656
  8. 2016Adversarial Training Methods for Semi-Supervised Text Classificationcited by 280
  9. 2019Predictive Biases in Natural Language Processing Models: A Conceptual Framework and Overviewcited by 137
  10. 2020MAVEN: A Massive General Domain Event Detection Datasetcited by 103
  11. 2019Compositional Questions Do Not Necessitate Multi-hop Reasoningcited by 87
  12. 2020Double Graph Based Reasoning for Document-level Relation Extractioncited by 87
12 more
  1. 2019Meta-Learning with Dynamic-Memory-Based Prototypical Network for Few-Shot Event Detectioncited by 54
  2. 2019Don't Take the Premise for Granted: Mitigating Artifacts in Natural Language Inferencecited by 48
  3. 2017The Effect of Different Writing Tasks on Linguistic Style: A Case Study of the ROC Story Cloze Taskcited by 39
  4. 2021Document-level Event Extraction via Heterogeneous Graph-based Interaction Model with a Trackercited by 29
  5. 2020Few-Shot Event Detection with Prototypical Amortized Conditional Random Fieldcited by 20
  6. 2020Extensively Matching for Few-shot Learning Event Detectioncited by 18
  7. 2020HypoNLI: Exploring the Artificial Patterns of Hypothesis-only Bias in Natural Language Inferencecited by 17
  8. 2020An Empirical Study on Model-agnostic Debiasing Strategies for Robust Natural Language Inferencecited by 16
  9. 2018Nugget Proposal Networks for Chinese Event Detectioncited by 11
  10. 2018Event Nugget Detection with Forward-Backward Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 7
  11. 2020Exploiting the Matching Information in the Support Set for Few Shot Event Classificationcited by 7
  12. 2020Discriminatively-Tuned Generative Classifiers for Robust Natural Language Inferencecited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 2; 2023: 5.

8 papers.