mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

A fuzzy-rough uncertainty measure to discover bias encoded explicitly or implicitly in features of structured pattern classification datasets

arXiv 2108.09098 ↗First posted 20 Aug 2021cs.LGcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The need to measure bias encoded in tabular data that are used to solve pattern recognition problems is widely recognized by academia, legislators and enterprises alike. In previous work, we proposed a bias quantification measure, called fuzzy-rough uncer-tainty, which relies on the fuzzy-rough set theory. The intuition dictates that protected features should not change the fuzzy-rough boundary regions of a decision class significantly. The extent to which this happens is a proxy for bias expressed as uncertainty in adecision-making context. Our measure's main advantage is that it does not depend on any machine learning prediction model but adistance function. In this paper, we extend our study by exploring the existence of bias encoded implicitly in non-protected featuresas defined by the correlation between protected and unprotected attributes. This analysis leads to four scenarios that domain experts should evaluate before deciding how to tackle bias. In addition, we conduct a sensitivity analysis to determine the fuzzy operatorsand distance function that best capture change in the boundary regions.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Aug 2021.

Builds on

8 of 36 references.

References · 8

  1. 2017Counterfactual Fairnesscited by 804
  2. 2016Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instrumentscited by 671
  3. 2017Algorithmic decision making and the cost of fairnesscited by 402
  4. 2018AI Fairness 360: An Extensible Toolkit for Detecting, Understanding, and Mitigating Unwanted Algorithmic Biascited by 319
  5. 2018Improving fairness in machine learning systems: What do industry practitioners need?cited by 262
  6. 2018A comparative study of fairness-enhancing interventions in machine learningcited by 208
  7. 2019On the Apparent Conflict Between Individual and Group Fairnesscited by 126
  8. 2019Learning Fair Naive Bayes Classifiers by Discovering and Eliminating Discrimination Patternscited by 14

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 0; 2023: 1; 2024: 1.

5 papers.