mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Active Assessment of Prediction Services as Accuracy Surface Over Attribute Combinations

arXiv 2108.06514 ↗First posted 14 Aug 2021cs.LGcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Our goal is to evaluate the accuracy of a black-box classification model, not as a single aggregate on a given test data distribution, but as a surface over a large number of combinations of attributes characterizing multiple test data distributions. Such attributed accuracy measures become important as machine learning models get deployed as a service, where the training data distribution is hidden from clients, and different clients may be interested in diverse regions of the data distribution. We present Attributed Accuracy Assay (AAA)--a Gaussian Process (GP)--based probabilistic estimator for such an accuracy surface. Each attribute combination, called an 'arm', is associated with a Beta density from which the service's accuracy is sampled. We expect the GP to smooth the parameters of the Beta density over related arms to mitigate sparsity. We show that obvious application of GPs cannot address the challenge of heteroscedastic uncertainty over a huge attribute space that is sparsely and unevenly populated. In response, we present two enhancements: pooling sparse observations, and regularizing the scale parameter of the Beta densities. After introducing these innovations, we establish the effectiveness of AAA in terms of both its estimation accuracy and exploration efficiency, through extensive experiments and analysis.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Aug 2021.

Builds on

22 of 40 references.

References · 22

  1. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,960
  2. 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,693
  3. 2020WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shiftscited by 1,375
  4. 2019Distributionally Robust Neural Networks for Group Shifts: On the Importance of Regularization for Worst-Case Generalizationcited by 1,247
  5. 2018Model Cards for Model Reportingcited by 1,080
  6. 2016COCO-Stuff: Thing and Stuff Classes in Contextcited by 864
  7. 2018GPyTorch: Blackbox Matrix-Matrix Gaussian Process Inference with GPU Accelerationcited by 609
  8. 2017DeepXplore: Automated Whitebox Testing of Deep Learning Systemscited by 311
  9. 2017DeepTest: Automated Testing of Deep-Neural-Network-driven Autonomous Carscited by 251
  10. 2014Scalable Variational Gaussian Process Classificationcited by 228
  11. 2019Machine Learning Testing: Survey, Landscapes and Horizonscited by 218
  12. 2019Hidden Stratification Causes Clinically Meaningful Failures in Machine Learning for Medical Imagingcited by 216
10 more
  1. 2016Stochastic Variational Deep Kernel Learningcited by 93
  2. 2018TensorFuzz: Debugging Neural Networks with Coverage-Guided Fuzzingcited by 68
  3. 2019Non-Parametric Calibration for Classificationcited by 57
  4. 2018Concolic Testing for Deep Neural Networkscited by 51
  5. 2020FrugalML: How to Use ML Prediction APIs More Accurately and Cheaplycited by 33
  6. 2020Can I Trust My Fairness Metric? Assessing Fairness with Unlabeled Data and Bayesian Inferencecited by 31
  7. 2020Online Active Model Selection for Pre-trained Classifierscited by 20
  8. 2020Active Bayesian Assessment for Black-Box Classifierscited by 17
  9. 2019A Programmatic and Semantic Approach to Explaining and DebuggingNeural Network Based Object Detectorscited by 11
  10. 2021Model-based metrics: Sample-efficient estimates of predictive model subpopulation performancecited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

5 papers.