mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A spectral-based analysis of the separation between two-layer neural networks and linear methods

arXiv 2108.04964 ↗First posted 10 Aug 2021stat.ML cs.LGcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We propose a spectral-based approach to analyze how two-layer neural networks separate from linear methods in terms of approximating high-dimensional functions. We show that quantifying this separation can be reduced to estimating the Kolmogorov width of two-layer neural networks, and the latter can be further characterized by using the spectrum of an associated kernel. Different from previous work, our approach allows obtaining upper bounds, lower bounds, and identifying explicit hard functions in a united manner. We provide a systematic study of how the choice of activation functions affects the separation, in particular the dependence on the input dimension. Specifically, for nonsmooth activation functions, we extend known results to more activation functions with sharper bounds. As concrete examples, we prove that any single neuron can instantiate the separation between neural networks and random feature models. For smooth activation functions, one surprising finding is that the separation is negligible unless the norms of inner-layer weights are polynomially large with respect to the input dimension. By contrast, the separation for nonsmooth activation functions is independent of the norms of inner-layer weights.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Aug 2021.

Builds on

25 of 56 references.

References · 25

  1. 2016Gaussian Error Linear Units (GELUs)cited by 3,431
  2. 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,597
  3. 2017Sigmoid-Weighted Linear Units for Neural Network Function Approximation in Reinforcement Learningcited by 935
  4. 2017The Deep Ritz method: A deep learning-based numerical algorithm for solving variational problemscited by 581
  5. 2019The generalization error of random features regression: Precise asymptotics and double descent curvecited by 410
  6. 2014Breaking the Curse of Dimensionality with Convex Neural Networkscited by 329
  7. 2019On the Inductive Bias of Neural Tangent Kernelscited by 177
  8. 2018Adaptivity of deep ReLU network for learning in Besov and mixed smooth Besov spaces: optimal rate and curse of dimensionalitycited by 160
  9. 2019Linearized two-layers neural networks in high dimensioncited by 155
  10. 2015On the Equivalence between Kernel Quadrature Rules and Random Feature Expansionscited by 136
  11. 2019A Function Space View of Bounded Norm Infinite Width ReLU Nets: The Multivariate Casecited by 113
  12. 2019On the Power and Limitations of Random Features for Understanding Neural Networkscited by 103
13 more
  1. 2020Deep Equals Shallow for ReLU Networks in Kernel Regimescited by 83
  2. 2018A Priori Estimates of the Population Risk for Two-layer Neural Networkscited by 76
  3. 2020Deep Neural Tangent Kernel and Laplace Kernel Have the Same RKHScited by 74
  4. 2014On the Computational Efficiency of Training Neural Networkscited by 71
  5. 2017SGD Learns the Conjugate Kernel Class of the Networkcited by 54
  6. 2019Approximation spaces of deep neural networkscited by 51
  7. 2016Diverse Neural Network Learns True Target Functionscited by 33
  8. 2018Learning with SGD and Random Featurescited by 33
  9. 2016Risk Bounds for High-dimensional Ridge Function Combinations Including Neural Networkscited by 26
  10. 2020A Dynamical Central Limit Theorem for Shallow Neural Networkscited by 22
  11. 2015ℓ1-regularized Neural Networks are Improperly Learnable in Polynomial Timecited by 16
  12. 2020When Hardness of Approximation Meets Hardness of Learningcited by 7
  13. 2021Sharp Lower Bounds on the Approximation Rate of Shallow Neural Networkscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

7 papers.