mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Local Morphometry of Closed, Implicit Surfaces

arXiv 2108.04354 ↗First posted 29 Jul 2021cs.CVcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Anatomical structures such as the hippocampus, liver, and bones can be analyzed as orientable, closed surfaces. This permits the computation of volume, surface area, mean curvature, Gaussian curvature, and the Euler-Poincar'e characteristic as well as comparison of these morphometrics between structures of different topology. The structures are commonly represented implicitly in curve evolution problems as the zero level set of an embedding. Practically, binary images of anatomical structures are embedded using a signed distance transform. However, quantization prevents the accurate computation of curvatures, leading to considerable errors in morphometry. This paper presents a fast, simple embedding procedure for accurate local morphometry as the zero crossing of the Gaussian blurred binary image. The proposed method was validated based on the femur and fourth lumbar vertebrae of 50 clinical computed tomography datasets. The results show that the signed distance transform leads to large quantization errors in the computed local curvature. Global validation of morphometry using regression and Bland-Altman analysis revealed that the coefficient of determination for the average mean curvature is improved from 93.8% with the signed distance transform to 100% with the proposed method. For the surface area, the proportional bias is improved from -5.0% for the signed distance transform to +0.6% for the proposed method. The Euler-Poincar'e characteristic is improved from unusable in the signed distance transform to 98% accuracy for the proposed method. The proposed method enables an improved local and global evaluation of curvature for purposes of morphometry on closed, implicit surfaces.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jul 2021.

Builds on

2 of 43 references.

References · 2

  1. 2017A Survey on Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysiscited by 1,186
  2. 2020Artifacts of Quantization in Distance Transformscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026High-Fidelity Medical Shape Generation via Skeletal Latent Diffusion
  2. 2024Probabilistic 3D Correspondence Prediction from Sparse Unsegmented Images
  3. 2024Weakly Supervised Bayesian Shape Modeling from Unsegmented Medical Images
  4. 2026ZODIAC: Zero-shot Octree-based Diffusion for Anatomical Completion
  5. 2023Point2SSM: Learning Morphological Variations of Anatomies from Point Cloud
  6. 2023Can point cloud networks learn statistical shape models of anatomies?
  7. 2023Mesh2SSM: From Surface Meshes to Statistical Shape Models of Anatomy
  8. 2024Signed Distance Field based Segmentation and Statistical Shape Modelling of the Left Atrial Appendage