mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Classification Auto-Encoder based Detector against Diverse Data Poisoning Attacks

arXiv 2108.04206 ↗First posted 9 Aug 2021cs.LGcited by 1

On the map: LLM safety and security → Backdoor and data poisoning attacks

Abstract (arXiv)

Poisoning attacks are a category of adversarial machine learning threats in which an adversary attempts to subvert the outcome of the machine learning systems by injecting crafted data into training data set, thus increasing the machine learning model's test error. The adversary can tamper with the data feature space, data labels, or both, each leading to a different attack strategy with different strengths. Various detection approaches have recently emerged, each focusing on one attack strategy. The Achilles heel of many of these detection approaches is their dependence on having access to a clean, untampered data set. In this paper, we propose CAE, a Classification Auto-Encoder based detector against diverse poisoned data. CAE can detect all forms of poisoning attacks using a combination of reconstruction and classification errors without having any prior knowledge of the attack strategy. We show that an enhanced version of CAE (called CAE+) does not have to employ a clean data set to train the defense model. Our experimental results on three real datasets MNIST, Fashion-MNIST and CIFAR demonstrate that our proposed method can maintain its functionality under up to 30% contaminated data and help the defended SVM classifier to regain its best accuracy.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Backdoor and data poisoning attacks, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 22 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Aug 2021.

Builds on

22 of 51 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2021De-Pois: An Attack-Agnostic Defense against Data Poisoning Attacks8 May
  2. 2021Data Poisoning Attacks and Defenses to Crowdsourcing Systems18 Feb

Other references · 20

  1. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
  2. 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
  3. 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,714
  4. 2017Certified Defenses for Data Poisoning Attackscited by 288
  5. 2017MagNet: a Two-Pronged Defense against Adversarial Examplescited by 268
  6. 2018Manipulating Machine Learning: Poisoning Attacks and Countermeasures for Regression Learningcited by 219
  7. 2017Towards Poisoning of Deep Learning Algorithms with Back-gradient Optimizationcited by 188
  8. 2018Stronger Data Poisoning Attacks Break Data Sanitization Defensescited by 125
  9. 2018Is feature selection secure against training data poisoning?cited by 88
  10. 2020Strong Data Augmentation Sanitizes Poisoning and Backdoor Attacks Without an Accuracy Tradeoffcited by 86
  11. 2020On the Effectiveness of Mitigating Data Poisoning Attacks with Gradient Shapingcited by 82
  12. 2019Learning to Confuse: Generating Training Time Adversarial Data with Auto-Encodercited by 70
8 more
  1. 2018Label Sanitization against Label Flipping Poisoning Attackscited by 68
  2. 2017Generative Poisoning Attack Method Against Neural Networkscited by 49
  3. 2018Detection of Adversarial Training Examples in Poisoning Attacks through Anomaly Detectioncited by 43
  4. 2017Security Evaluation of Pattern Classifiers under Attackcited by 39
  5. 2020Poison Attacks against Text Datasets with Conditional Adversarially Regularized Autoencodercited by 27
  6. 2018Clustering and Unsupervised Anomaly Detection with L2 Normalized Deep Auto-Encoder Representationscited by 17
  7. 2016Curie: A method for protecting SVM Classifier from Poisoning Attackcited by 9
  8. 2020Regularisation Can Mitigate Poisoning Attacks: A Novel Analysis Based on Multiobjective Bilevel Optimisationcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.