mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Mixture of Linear Models Co-supervised by Deep Neural Networks

arXiv 2108.04035 ↗First posted 5 Aug 2021cs.LG stat.MLcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep neural network (DNN) models have achieved phenomenal success for applications in many domains, ranging from academic research in science and engineering to industry and business. The modeling power of DNN is believed to have come from the complexity and over-parameterization of the model, which on the other hand has been criticized for the lack of interpretation. Although certainly not true for every application, in some applications, especially in economics, social science, healthcare industry, and administrative decision making, scientists or practitioners are resistant to use predictions made by a black-box system for multiple reasons. One reason is that a major purpose of a study can be to make discoveries based upon the prediction function, e.g., to reveal the relationships between measurements. Another reason can be that the training dataset is not large enough to make researchers feel completely sure about a purely data-driven result. Being able to examine and interpret the prediction function will enable researchers to connect the result with existing knowledge or gain insights about new directions to explore. Although classic statistical models are much more explainable, their accuracy often falls considerably below DNN. In this paper, we propose an approach to fill the gap between relatively simple explainable models and DNN such that we can more flexibly tune the trade-off between interpretability and accuracy. Our main idea is a mixture of discriminative models that is trained with the guidance from a DNN. Although mixtures of discriminative models have been studied before, our way of generating the mixture is quite different.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Aug 2021.

Builds on

14 of 55 references.

References · 14

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  3. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  4. 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,530
  5. 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,400
  6. 2018This Looks Like That: Deep Learning for Interpretable Image Recognitioncited by 731
  7. 2020Neural Additive Models: Interpretable Machine Learning with Neural Netscited by 318
  8. 2016Model-Agnostic Interpretability of Machine Learningcited by 219
  9. 2017Interpretable Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 161
  10. 2017Detecting Statistical Interactions from Neural Network Weightscited by 80
  11. 2019Exploring Interpretable LSTM Neural Networks over Multi-Variable Datacited by 42
  12. 2018Explaining Deep Learning Models - A Bayesian Non-parametric Approachcited by 16
2 more
  1. 2013The return of AdaBoost.MH: multi-class Hamming treescited by 10
  2. 2020An interpretable neural network model through piecewise linear approximationcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

4 papers.