Language Model Evaluation in Open-ended Text Generation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Although current state-of-the-art language models have achieved impressive results in numerous natural language processing tasks, still they could not solve the problem of producing repetitive, dull and sometimes inconsistent text in open-ended text generation. Studies often attribute this problem to the maximum likelihood training objective, and propose alternative approaches by using stochastic decoding methods or altering the training objective. However, there is still a lack of consistent evaluation metrics to directly compare the efficacy of these solutions. In this work, we study different evaluation metrics that have been proposed to evaluate quality, diversity and consistency of machine-generated text. From there, we propose a practical pipeline to evaluate language models in open-ended generation task, and research on how to improve the model's performance in all dimensions by leveraging different auxiliary training objectives.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 51 of its 82 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Aug 2021.
Builds on
51 of 82 references.
References · 51
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,530
- 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,346
- 2019DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lightercited by 4,243
- 2013Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionalitycited by 3,462
- 2016Pointer Sentinel Mixture Modelscited by 2,992
- 2014Sequence to Sequence Learning with Neural Networkscited by 2,974
- 2017Progressive Growing of GANs for Improved Quality, Stability, and Variationcited by 2,967
- 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,881
- 2019XLNet: Generalized Autoregressive Pretraining for Language Understandingcited by 2,801
38 more
- 2017A Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for Sentence Understanding through Inferencecited by 2,665
- 2018Large Scale GAN Training for High Fidelity Natural Image Synthesiscited by 2,609
- 2018Deep contextualized word representationscited by 2,285
- 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferencescited by 2,124
- 2015Unsupervised Representation Learning with Deep Convolutional Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 2,048
- 2019Language Models as Knowledge Bases?cited by 1,922
- 2019PEGASUS: Pre-training with Extracted Gap-sentences for Abstractive Summarizationcited by 1,100
- 2015Effective Approaches to Attention-based Neural Machine Translationcited by 1,024
- 2019Attention is not Explanationcited by 916
- 2018Personalizing Dialogue Agents: I have a dog, do you have pets too?cited by 820
- 2015Scheduled Sampling for Sequence Prediction with Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 779
- 2019CTRL: A Conditional Transformer Language Model for Controllable Generationcited by 754
- 2016StackGAN: Text to Photo-realistic Image Synthesis with Stacked Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 575
- 2019Neural Text Generation with Unlikelihood Trainingcited by 489
- 2018Texygen: A Benchmarking Platform for Text Generation Modelscited by 484
- 2016A Corpus and Evaluation Framework for Deeper Understanding of Commonsense Storiescited by 413
- 2015A Neural Attention Model for Abstractive Sentence Summarizationcited by 394
- 2020Fine-Tuning Pretrained Language Models: Weight Initializations, Data Orders, and Early Stoppingcited by 377
- 2016SeqGAN: Sequence Generative Adversarial Nets with Policy Gradientcited by 375
- 2020Recall and Learn: Fine-tuning Deep Pretrained Language Models with Less Forgettingcited by 169
- 2018Dialogue Natural Language Inferencecited by 135
- 2019Unifying Human and Statistical Evaluation for Natural Language Generationcited by 127
- 2019Don't Say That! Making Inconsistent Dialogue Unlikely with Unlikelihood Trainingcited by 110
- 2019StructBERT: Incorporating Language Structures into Pre-training for Deep Language Understandingcited by 108
- 2017Long Text Generation via Adversarial Training with Leaked Informationcited by 100
- 2018Language GANs Falling Shortcited by 97
- 2017Structured Attention Networkscited by 95
- 2020Trading Off Diversity and Quality in Natural Language Generationcited by 94
- 2019Do Massively Pretrained Language Models Make Better Storytellers?cited by 90
- 2015How (not) to Train your Generative Model: Scheduled Sampling, Likelihood, Adversary?cited by 76
- 2017Generating High-Quality and Informative Conversation Responses with Sequence-to-Sequence Modelscited by 42
- 2020A Systematic Characterization of Sampling Algorithms for Open-ended Language Generationcited by 28
- 2020How Furiously Can Colourless Green Ideas Sleep? Sentence Acceptability in Contextcited by 26
- 2020Sparse Text Generationcited by 24
- 2019Latent Relation Language Modelscited by 14
- 2017Differentiable Scheduled Sampling for Credit Assignmentcited by 13
- 2018Why are Sequence-to-Sequence Models So Dull? Understanding the Low-Diversity Problem of Chatbotscited by 12
- 2018Eval all, trust a few, do wrong to none: Comparing sentence generation modelscited by 8
50 most cited of 51 All 51 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2.
2 papers.