mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Basis Scaling and Double Pruning for Efficient Inference in Network-Based Transfer Learning

arXiv 2108.02893 ↗First posted 6 Aug 2021cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Network-based transfer learning allows the reuse of deep learning features with limited data, but the resulting models can be unnecessarily large. Although network pruning can improve inference efficiency, existing algorithms usually require fine-tuning that may not be suitable for small datasets. In this paper, using the singular value decomposition, we decompose a convolutional layer into two layers: a convolutional layer with the orthonormal basis vectors as the filters, and a "BasisScalingConv" layer which is responsible for rescaling the features and transforming them back to the original space. As the filters in each decomposed layer are linearly independent, when using the proposed basis scaling factors with the Taylor approximation of importance, pruning can be more effective and fine-tuning individual weights is unnecessary. Furthermore, as the numbers of input and output channels of the original convolutional layer remain unchanged after basis pruning, it is applicable to virtually all architectures and can be combined with existing pruning algorithms for double pruning to further increase the pruning capability. When transferring knowledge from ImageNet pre-trained models to different target domains, with less than 1% reduction in classification accuracies, we can achieve pruning ratios up to 74.6% for CIFAR-10 and 98.9% for MNIST in model parameters.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Aug 2021.

Builds on

22 of 42 references.

References · 22

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
  3. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  4. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
  5. 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 4,993
  6. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
  7. 2016V-Net: Fully Convolutional Neural Networks for Volumetric Medical Image Segmentationcited by 2,284
  8. 2019Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisitedcited by 1,695
  9. 2017Channel Pruning for Accelerating Very Deep Neural Networkscited by 697
  10. 2017Learning Efficient Convolutional Networks through Network Slimmingcited by 673
  11. 2019Green AIcited by 620
  12. 2016Learning Structured Sparsity in Deep Neural Networkscited by 538
10 more
  1. 2019Importance Estimation for Neural Network Pruningcited by 531
  2. 2017ThiNet: A Filter Level Pruning Method for Deep Neural Network Compressioncited by 438
  3. 2018A Survey on Deep Transfer Learningcited by 417
  4. 2020HRank: Filter Pruning using High-Rank Feature Mapcited by 291
  5. 2016Revisiting Batch Normalization For Practical Domain Adaptationcited by 285
  6. 2014Speeding up Convolutional Neural Networks with Low Rank Expansionscited by 283
  7. 2018Rethinking the Smaller-Norm-Less-Informative Assumption in Channel Pruning of Convolution Layerscited by 112
  8. 2021Convolutional Neural Network Pruning with Structural Redundancy Reductioncited by 73
  9. 2020Learning Low-rank Deep Neural Networks via Singular Vector Orthogonality Regularization and Singular Value Sparsificationcited by 52
  10. 2018A Low Effort Approach to Structured CNN Design Using PCAcited by 14

Built on by

Not cited yet.