mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Jointly Optimizing Query Encoder and Product Quantization to Improve Retrieval Performance

arXiv 2108.00644 ↗First posted 2 Aug 2021cs.IRcited by 35

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recently, Information Retrieval community has witnessed fast-paced advances in Dense Retrieval (DR), which performs first-stage retrieval with embedding-based search. Despite the impressive ranking performance, previous studies usually adopt brute-force search to acquire candidates, which is prohibitive in practical Web search scenarios due to its tremendous memory usage and time cost. To overcome these problems, vector compression methods have been adopted in many practical embedding-based retrieval applications. One of the most popular methods is Product Quantization (PQ). However, although existing vector compression methods including PQ can help improve the efficiency of DR, they incur severely decayed retrieval performance due to the separation between encoding and compression. To tackle this problem, we present JPQ, which stands for Joint optimization of query encoding and Product Quantization. It trains the query encoder and PQ index jointly in an end-to-end manner based on three optimization strategies, namely ranking-oriented loss, PQ centroid optimization, and end-to-end negative sampling. We evaluate JPQ on two publicly available retrieval benchmarks. Experimental results show that JPQ significantly outperforms popular vector compression methods. Compared with previous DR models that use brute-force search, JPQ almost matches the best retrieval performance with 30x compression on index size. The compressed index further brings 10x speedup on CPU and 2x speedup on GPU in query latency.

Key facts. Cited by 35 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 2 Aug 2021.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 4; 2022: 11; 2023: 6; 2024: 4; 2025: 5; 2026: 5.

35 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2021ColBERTv2: Effective and Efficient Retrieval via Lightweight Late Interactioncited by 464
  2. 2023Recommendation as Instruction Following: A Large Language Model Empowered Recommendation Approachcited by 168
  3. 2022Learning Vector-Quantized Item Representation for Transferable Sequential Recommenderscited by 112
  4. 2021The Web Is Your Oyster - Knowledge-Intensive NLP against a Very Large Web Corpuscited by 60
  5. 2025A Survey on Knowledge-Oriented Retrieval-Augmented Generationcited by 34
  6. 2022Fine-Grained Distillation for Long Document Retrievalcited by 29
  7. 2024Reducing the Footprint of Multi-Vector Retrieval with Minimal Performance Impact via Token Poolingcited by 23
  8. 2022Introducing Neural Bag of Whole-Words with ColBERTer: Contextualized Late Interactions using Enhanced Reductioncited by 21
  9. 2022A Survey for Efficient Open Domain Question Answeringcited by 20
  10. 2023Embedding in Recommender Systems: A Surveycited by 19
  11. 2023IRGen: Generative Modeling for Image Retrievalcited by 18
  12. 2022Distill-VQ: Learning Retrieval Oriented Vector Quantization By Distilling Knowledge from Dense Embeddingscited by 17
23 more
  1. 2023Constructing Tree-based Index for Efficient and Effective Dense Retrievalcited by 15
  2. 2021Boosted Dense Retrievercited by 10
  3. 2022Hybrid Contrastive Quantization for Efficient Cross-View Video Retrievalcited by 8
  4. 2022A Study on the Efficiency and Generalization of Light Hybrid Retrieverscited by 7
  5. 2023ESPN: Memory-Efficient Multi-Vector Information Retrievalcited by 7
  6. 2023Low-bit Quantization for Deep Graph Neural Networks with Smoothness-aware Message Propagationcited by 5
  7. 2021CODER: An efficient framework for improving retrieval through COntextual Document Embedding Rerankingcited by 4
  8. 2022Injecting Domain Adaptation with Learning-to-hash for Effective and Efficient Zero-shot Dense Retrievalcited by 4
  9. 2024QAEA-DR: A Unified Text Augmentation Framework for Dense Retrievalcited by 4
  10. 2025Balancing the Blend: An Experimental Analysis of Trade-offs in Hybrid Searchcited by 4
  11. 2022Hybrid Inverted Index Is a Robust Accelerator for Dense Retrievalcited by 2
  12. 2024Bootstrapped Pre-training with Dynamic Identifier Prediction for Generative Retrievalcited by 2
  13. 2022Are We There Yet? A Decision Framework for Replacing Term Based Retrieval with Dense Retrieval Systemscited by 1
  14. 2024pEBR: A Probabilistic Approach to Embedding Based Retrievalcited by 1
  15. 2025Balancing Accuracy and Novelty with Sub-Item Popularitycited by 1
  16. 2026When Is 0.1% Enough? Analyzing the Combined Effects of Dimensionality Reduction and Quantization on Text Embedding Compressioncited by 1
  17. 2026Matryoshka Hash Representations for Model-Aware Compact Semantic Retrievalcited by 1
  18. 2022Enhanced vectors for top-k document retrieval in Question Answeringcited by 0
  19. 2025Compressed Concatenation of Small Embedding Modelscited by 0
  20. 2025A Simple and Effective Framework for Symmetric Consistent Indexing in Large-Scale Dense Retrievalcited by 0
  21. 2026Where Post-Training Quantization Breaks Text Embedders: A Measured Map Across Four Embedder Familiescited by 0
  22. 2026The Undetected Damage of Quantization on Retrieval and How to Fix Itcited by 0
  23. 2026Quantization Enables Private Dense Retrieval against Malicious Service Providerscited by 0