mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Addressing materials' microstructure diversity using transfer learning

arXiv 2107.13841 ↗First posted 29 Jul 2021cond-mat.mtrl-sci cs.LGcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Materials' microstructures are signatures of their alloying composition and processing history. Therefore, microstructures exist in a wide variety. As materials become increasingly complex to comply with engineering demands, advanced computer vision (CV) approaches such as deep learning (DL) inevitably gain relevance for quantifying microstrucutures' constituents from micrographs. While DL can outperform classical CV techniques for many tasks, shortcomings are poor data efficiency and generalizability across datasets. This is inherently in conflict with the expense associated with annotating materials data through experts and extensive materials diversity. To tackle poor domain generalizability and the lack of labeled data simultaneously, we propose to apply a sub-class of transfer learning methods called unsupervised domain adaptation (UDA). These algorithms address the task of finding domain-invariant features when supplied with annotated source data and unannotated target data, such that performance on the latter distribution is optimized despite the absence of annotations. Exemplarily, this study is conducted on a lath-shaped bainite segmentation task in complex phase steel micrographs. Here, the domains to bridge are selected to be different metallographic specimen preparations (surface etchings) and distinct imaging modalities. We show that a state-of-the-art UDA approach surpasses the na"ive application of source domain trained models on the target domain (generalization baseline) to a large extent. This holds true independent of the domain shift, despite using little data, and even when the baseline models were pre-trained or employed data augmentation. Through UDA, mIoU was improved over generalization baselines from 82.2%, 61.0%, 49.7% to 84.7%, 67.3%, 73.3% on three target datasets, respectively. This underlines this techniques' potential to cope with materials variance.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jul 2021.

Builds on

30 of 55 references.

References · 30

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
  3. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  4. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  5. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
  6. 2016The Cityscapes Dataset for Semantic Urban Scene Understandingcited by 4,427
  7. 2016DeepLab: Semantic Image Segmentation with Deep Convolutional Nets, Atrous Convolution, and Fully Connected CRFscited by 3,239
  8. 2014Unsupervised Domain Adaptation by Backpropagationcited by 1,906
  9. 2014How transferable are features in deep neural networks?cited by 1,216
  10. 2016Playing for Data: Ground Truth from Computer Gamescited by 816
  11. 2018Recognition in Terra Incognitacited by 655
  12. 2018ADVENT: Adversarial Entropy Minimization for Domain Adaptation in Semantic Segmentationcited by 623
18 more
  1. 2018Learning to Adapt Structured Output Space for Semantic Segmentationcited by 584
  2. 2018Albumentations: fast and flexible image augmentationscited by 558
  3. 2017Understanding the Effective Receptive Field in Deep Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 549
  4. 2020FDA: Fourier Domain Adaptation for Semantic Segmentationcited by 540
  5. 2018Rethinking ImageNet Pre-trainingcited by 376
  6. 2020DACS: Domain Adaptation via Cross-domain Mixed Samplingcited by 226
  7. 2017Convolutional Neural Networks for Medical Image Analysis: Full Training or Fine Tuning?cited by 220
  8. 2020Unsupervised Intra-domain Adaptation for Semantic Segmentation through Self-Supervisioncited by 198
  9. 2018Zero-shot Recognition via Semantic Embeddings and Knowledge Graphscited by 155
  10. 2016The More You Know: Using Knowledge Graphs for Image Classificationcited by 63
  11. 2018Unsupervised Cross-Modality Domain Adaptation of ConvNets for Biomedical Image Segmentations with Adversarial Losscited by 60
  12. 2020Collaborative Unsupervised Domain Adaptation for Medical Image Diagnosiscited by 60
  13. 2017Checkerboard artifact free sub-pixel convolution: A note on sub-pixel convolution, resize convolution and convolution resizecited by 37
  14. 2018High throughput quantitative metallography for complex microstructures using deep learning: A case study in ultrahigh carbon steelcited by 19
  15. 2017Advanced Steel Microstructural Classification by Deep Learning Methodscited by 15
  16. 2018Cats or CAT scans: transfer learning from natural or medical image source datasets?cited by 14
  17. 2019Targeted transfer learning to improve performance in small medical physics datasetscited by 11
  18. 2020An analysis of the transfer learning of convolutional neural networks for artistic imagescited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

4 papers.