Constant Function Market Makers: Multi-Asset Trades via Convex Optimization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The rise of Ethereum and other blockchains that support smart contracts has led to the creation of decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as Uniswap, Balancer, Curve, mStable, and SushiSwap, which enable agents to trade cryptocurrencies without trusting a centralized authority. While traditional exchanges use order books to match and execute trades, DEXs are typically organized as constant function market makers (CFMMs). CFMMs accept and reject proposed trades based on the evaluation of a function that depends on the proposed trade and the current reserves of the DEX. For trades that involve only two assets, CFMMs are easy to understand, via two functions that give the quantity of one asset that must be tendered to receive a given quantity of the other, and vice versa. When more than two assets are being exchanged, it is harder to understand the landscape of possible trades. We observe that various problems of choosing a multi-asset trade can be formulated as convex optimization problems, and can therefore be reliably and efficiently solved.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 26 Jul 2021.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2.
3 papers.
- 2022Explainable AI via Learning to Optimizecited by 14
- 2023Uniswap Liquidity Provision: An Online Learning Approachcited by 5
- 2023ZeroSwap: Data-driven Optimal Market Making in DeFicited by 0
- 2023ZeroSwap: Data-driven Optimal Market Making in DeFi13 Oct 2023
- 2023Uniswap Liquidity Provision: An Online Learning Approach1 Feb 2023
- 2022Explainable AI via Learning to Optimize29 Apr 2022