mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Improve Unsupervised Pretraining for Few-label Transfer

arXiv 2107.12369 ↗First posted 26 Jul 2021cs.CV cs.LGcited by 15

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Unsupervised pretraining has achieved great success and many recent works have shown unsupervised pretraining can achieve comparable or even slightly better transfer performance than supervised pretraining on downstream target datasets. But in this paper, we find this conclusion may not hold when the target dataset has very few labeled samples for finetuning, ie, few-label transfer. We analyze the possible reason from the clustering perspective: 1) The clustering quality of target samples is of great importance to few-label transfer; 2) Though contrastive learning is essential to learn how to cluster, its clustering quality is still inferior to supervised pretraining due to lack of label supervision. Based on the analysis, we interestingly discover that only involving some unlabeled target domain into the unsupervised pretraining can improve the clustering quality, subsequently reducing the transfer performance gap with supervised pretraining. This finding also motivates us to propose a new progressive few-label transfer algorithm for real applications, which aims to maximize the transfer performance under a limited annotation budget. To support our analysis and proposed method, we conduct extensive experiments on nine different target datasets. Experimental results show our proposed method can significantly boost the few-label transfer performance of unsupervised pretraining.

Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Jul 2021.

Builds on

22 of 36 references.

References · 22

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
  3. 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,482
  4. 2017Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning for Fast Adaptation of Deep Networkscited by 4,861
  5. 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,712
  6. 2020Unsupervised Learning of Visual Features by Contrasting Cluster Assignmentscited by 2,845
  7. 2020Improved Baselines with Momentum Contrastive Learningcited by 2,282
  8. 2013Describing Textures in the Wildcited by 2,110
  9. 2020FixMatch: Simplifying Semi-Supervised Learning with Consistency and Confidencecited by 2,080
  10. 2018Unsupervised Feature Learning via Non-Parametric Instance-level Discriminationcited by 1,838
  11. 2017EuroSAT: A Novel Dataset and Deep Learning Benchmark for Land Use and Land Cover Classificationcited by 1,488
  12. 2020Understanding Contrastive Representation Learning through Alignment and Uniformity on the Hyperspherecited by 1,393
10 more
  1. 2020Big Self-Supervised Models are Strong Semi-Supervised Learnerscited by 1,375
  2. 2017Deep Bayesian Active Learning with Image Datacited by 812
  3. 2019Big Transfer (BiT): General Visual Representation Learningcited by 766
  4. 2019A Closer Look at Few-shot Classificationcited by 679
  5. 2018Rethinking ImageNet Pre-trainingcited by 376
  6. 2019ReMixMatch: Semi-Supervised Learning with Distribution Alignment and Augmentation Anchoringcited by 349
  7. 2019A Baseline for Few-Shot Image Classificationcited by 298
  8. 2020Intriguing Properties of Contrastive Lossescited by 129
  9. 2020Unsupervised Pre-training for Person Re-identificationcited by 94
  10. 2020Density-Aware Graph for Deep Semi-Supervised Visual Recognitioncited by 15

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 4; 2022: 5; 2023: 5; 2024: 1.

15 papers.

Sort: