mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Synthetic Periocular Iris PAI from a Small Set of Near-Infrared-Images

arXiv 2107.12014 ↗First posted 26 Jul 2021cs.CVcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Biometric has been increasing in relevance these days since it can be used for several applications such as access control for instance. Unfortunately, with the increased deployment of biometric applications, we observe an increase of attacks. Therefore, algorithms to detect such attacks (Presentation Attack Detection (PAD)) have been increasing in relevance. The LivDet-2020 competition which focuses on Presentation Attacks Detection (PAD) algorithms have shown still open problems, specially for unknown attacks scenarios. In order to improve the robustness of biometric systems, it is crucial to improve PAD methods. This can be achieved by augmenting the number of presentation attack instruments (PAI) and bona fide images that are used to train such algorithms. Unfortunately, the capture and creation of presentation attack instruments and even the capture of bona fide images is sometimes complex to achieve. This paper proposes a novel PAI synthetically created (SPI-PAI) using four state-of-the-art GAN algorithms (cGAN, WGAN, WGAN-GP, and StyleGAN2) and a small set of periocular NIR images. A benchmark between GAN algorithms is performed using the Frechet Inception Distance (FID) between the generated images and the original images used for training. The best PAD algorithm reported by the LivDet-2020 competition was tested for us using the synthetic PAI which was obtained with the StyleGAN2 algorithm. Surprisingly, The PAD algorithm was not able to detect the synthetic images as a Presentation Attack, categorizing all of them as bona fide. Such results demonstrated the feasibility of synthetic images to fool presentation attacks detection algorithms and the need for such algorithms to be constantly updated and trained with a larger number of images and PAI scenarios.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Jul 2021.

Builds on

16 of 30 references.

References · 16

  1. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  2. 2016Image-to-Image Translation with Conditional Adversarial Networkscited by 4,510
  3. 2016Improved Techniques for Training GANscited by 2,938
  4. 2018Large Scale GAN Training for High Fidelity Natural Image Synthesiscited by 2,609
  5. 2017Improved Training of Wasserstein GANscited by 2,223
  6. 2014Conditional Generative Adversarial Netscited by 2,152
  7. 2020Training Generative Adversarial Networks with Limited Datacited by 1,184
  8. 2017High-Resolution Image Synthesis and Semantic Manipulation with Conditional GANscited by 1,176
  9. 2016InfoGAN: Interpretable Representation Learning by Information Maximizing Generative Adversarial Netscited by 858
  10. 2017GANs Trained by a Two Time-Scale Update Rule Converge to a Local Nash Equilibriumcited by 208
  11. 2018An empirical study on evaluation metrics of generative adversarial networkscited by 81
  12. 2020Iris Liveness Detection Competition (LivDet-Iris) -- The 2020 Editioncited by 27
4 more
  1. 2018Iris-GAN: Learning to Generate Realistic Iris Images Using Convolutional GANcited by 9
  2. 2021Iris Liveness Detection using a Cascade of Dedicated Deep Learning Networkscited by 9
  3. 2020CNN Hyperparameter tuning applied to Iris Liveness Detectioncited by 6
  4. 2018Open Source Presentation Attack Detection Baseline for Iris Recognitioncited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1.

2 papers.