Logspace Reducibility From Secret Leakage Planted Clique
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The planted clique problem is well-studied in the context of observing, explaining, and predicting interesting computational phenomena associated with statistical problems. When equating computational efficiency with the existence of polynomial time algorithms, the computational hardness of (some variant of) the planted clique problem can be used to infer the computational hardness of a host of other statistical problems. Is this ability to transfer computational hardness from (some variant of) the planted clique problem to other statistical problems robust to changing our notion of computational efficiency to space efficiency? We answer this question affirmatively for three different statistical problems, namely Sparse PCA, submatrix detection, and testing almost k-wise independence. The key challenge is that space efficient randomized reductions need to repeatedly access the randomness they use. Known reductions to these problems are all randomized and need polynomially many random bits to implement. Since we can not store polynomially many random bits in memory, it is unclear how to implement these existing reductions space efficiently. There are two ideas involved in circumventing this issue and implementing known reductions to these problems space efficiently. 1. When solving statistical problems, we can use parts of the input itself as randomness. 2. Secret leakage variants of the planted clique problem with appropriate secret leakage can be more useful than the standard planted clique problem when we want to use parts of the input as randomness. (abstract shortened due to arxiv constraints)
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 83 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Jul 2021.
Builds on
25 of 83 references.
References · 25
- 2019Notes on Computational Hardness of Hypothesis Testing: Predictions using the Low-Degree Likelihood Ratiocited by 82
- 2017The power of sum-of-squares for detecting hidden structurescited by 54
- 2017Tensor SVD: Statistical and Computational Limitscited by 52
- 2020Reducibility and Statistical-Computational Gaps from Secret Leakagecited by 50
- 2018Reducibility and Computational Lower Bounds for Problems with Planted Sparse Structurecited by 35
- 2014Statistical-Computational Tradeoffs in Planted Problems and Submatrix Localization with a Growing Number of Clusters and Submatricescited by 29
- 2020Tensor Clustering with Planted Structures: Statistical Optimality and Computational Limitscited by 29
- 2017Bayesian estimation from few samples: community detection and related problemscited by 28
- 2014Statistical and computational trade-offs in estimation of sparse principal componentscited by 26
- 2014Sparse CCA: Adaptive Estimation and Computational Barrierscited by 25
- 2014Computational Lower Bounds for Community Detection on Random Graphscited by 21
- 2021On the Cryptographic Hardness of Learning Single Periodic Neuronscited by 20
13 more
- 2019Universality of Computational Lower Bounds for Submatrix Detectioncited by 13
- 2019Optimal Average-Case Reductions to Sparse PCA: From Weak Assumptions to Strong Hardnesscited by 13
- 2015Computational and Statistical Boundaries for Submatrix Localization in a Large Noisy Matrixcited by 12
- 2015Sum-of-squares lower bounds for planted cliquecited by 12
- 2020Counterexamples to the Low-Degree Conjecturecited by 12
- 2015Improved Sum-of-Squares Lower Bounds for Hidden Clique and Hidden Submatrix Problemscited by 9
- 2020The Strongish Planted Clique Hypothesis and Its Consequencescited by 5
- 2021Average-Case Communication Complexity of Statistical Problemscited by 5
- 2017Robust Sparse Estimation Tasks in High Dimensionscited by 4
- 2020Finding Planted Cliques in Sublinear Timecited by 4
- 2019The Average-Case Complexity of Counting Cliques in Erdos-Renyi Hypergraphscited by 3
- 2018On closeness to k-wise uniformitycited by 2
- 2020Is the space complexity of planted clique recovery the same as that of detection?cited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.