Robust Adaptive Submodular Maximization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The goal of a sequential decision making problem is to design an interactive policy that adaptively selects a group of items, each selection is based on the feedback from the past, in order to maximize the expected utility of selected items. It has been shown that the utility functions of many real-world applications are adaptive submodular. However, most of existing studies on adaptive submodular optimization focus on the average-case. Unfortunately, a policy that has a good average-case performance may have very poor performance under the worst-case realization. In this study, we propose to study two variants of adaptive submodular optimization problems, namely, worst-case adaptive submodular maximization and robust submodular maximization. The first problem aims to find a policy that maximizes the worst-case utility and the latter one aims to find a policy, if any, that achieves both near optimal average-case utility and worst-case utility simultaneously. We introduce a new class of stochastic functions, called worst-case submodular function. For the worst-case adaptive submodular maximization problem subject to a p-system constraint, we develop an adaptive worst-case greedy policy that achieves a frac1p+1 approximation ratio against the optimal worst-case utility if the utility function is worst-case submodular. For the robust adaptive submodular maximization problem subject to cardinality constraints (resp. partition matroid constraints), if the utility function is both worst-case submodular and adaptive submodular, we develop a hybrid adaptive policy that achieves an approximation close to 1-e^-frac12 (resp. 1/3) under both worst- and average-case settings simultaneously. We also describe several applications of our theoretical results, including pool-base active learning, stochastic submodular set cover and adaptive viral marketing.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Jul 2021.
Builds on
9 of 36 references.
References · 9
- 2014Lazier Than Lazy Greedycited by 97
- 2020Fast Adaptive Non-Monotone Submodular Maximization Subject to a Knapsack Constraintcited by 21
- 2020Beyond Pointwise Submodularity: Non-Monotone Adaptive Submodular Maximization in Linear Timecited by 12
- 2021Optimal Sampling Gaps for Adaptive Submodular Maximizationcited by 9
- 2021Adaptive Regularized Submodular Maximizationcited by 8
- 2021Beyond Pointwise Submodularity: Non-Monotone Adaptive Submodular Maximization subject to Knapsack and k-System Constraintscited by 8
- 2016No Time to Observe: Adaptive Influence Maximization with Partial Feedbackcited by 6
- 2018Stochastic Submodular Cover with Limited Adaptivitycited by 5
- 2018Towards Nearly-linear Time Algorithms for Submodular Maximization with a Matroid Constraintcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 0; 2024: 1.
4 papers.
- 2022Partial-Monotone Adaptive Submodular Maximizationcited by 2
- 2022Streaming Adaptive Submodular Maximizationcited by 2
- 2022Worst-Case Adaptive Submodular Covercited by 0
- 2024Adaptive Combinatorial Maximization: Beyond Approximate Greedy Policiescited by 0
- 2024Adaptive Combinatorial Maximization: Beyond Approximate Greedy Policies2 Apr 2024
- 2022Worst-Case Adaptive Submodular Cover25 Oct 2022
- 2022Streaming Adaptive Submodular Maximization17 Aug 2022
- 2022Partial-Monotone Adaptive Submodular Maximization26 Jul 2022