Optimal Sampling Gaps for Adaptive Submodular Maximization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Running machine learning algorithms on large and rapidly growing volumes of data is often computationally expensive, one common trick to reduce the size of a data set, and thus reduce the computational cost of machine learning algorithms, is probability sampling. It creates a sampled data set by including each data point from the original data set with a known probability. Although the benefit of running machine learning algorithms on the reduced data set is obvious, one major concern is that the performance of the solution obtained from samples might be much worse than that of the optimal solution when using the full data set. In this paper, we examine the performance loss caused by probability sampling in the context of adaptive submodular maximization. We consider a simple probability sampling method which selects each data point with probability at least r∈[0,1]. If we set r=1, our problem reduces to finding a solution based on the original full data set. We define sampling gap as the largest ratio between the optimal solution obtained from the full data set and the optimal solution obtained from the samples, over independence systems. Our main contribution is to show that if the sampling probability of each data point is at least r and the utility function is policywise submodular, then the sampling gap is both upper bounded and lower bounded by 1/r. We show that the property of policywise submodular can be found in a wide range of real-world applications, including pool-based active learning and adaptive viral marketing.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Apr 2021.
Builds on
6 of 30 references.
References · 6
- 2014Lazier Than Lazy Greedycited by 99
- 2020Fast Adaptive Non-Monotone Submodular Maximization Subject to a Knapsack Constraintcited by 21
- 2017Greed is Good: Near-Optimal Submodular Maximization via Greedy Optimizationcited by 11
- 2018Towards Nearly-linear Time Algorithms for Submodular Maximization with a Matroid Constraintcited by 4
- 2019Beyond Adaptive Submodularity: Approximation Guarantees of Greedy Policy with Adaptive Submodularity Ratiocited by 4
- 2019Price of Dependence: Stochastic Submodular Maximization with Dependent Itemscited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 4; 2023: 1; 2024: 1.
9 papers.
- 2021Beyond Pointwise Submodularity: Non-Monotone Adaptive Submodular Maximization subject to Knapsack and k-System Constraintscited by 8
- 2022Group Equality in Adaptive Submodular Maximizationcited by 5
- 2021Robust Adaptive Submodular Maximizationcited by 4
- 2022Partial-Monotone Adaptive Submodular Maximizationcited by 2
- 2022Streaming Adaptive Submodular Maximizationcited by 2
- 2023Non-monotone Sequential Submodular Maximizationcited by 2
- 2021Partial-Adaptive Submodular Maximizationcited by 1
- 2022Worst-Case Adaptive Submodular Covercited by 0
- 2024Learning Submodular Sequencing from Samplescited by 0
- 2024Learning Submodular Sequencing from Samples9 Sep 2024
- 2023Non-monotone Sequential Submodular Maximization16 Aug 2023
- 2022Worst-Case Adaptive Submodular Cover25 Oct 2022
- 2022Streaming Adaptive Submodular Maximization17 Aug 2022
- 2022Partial-Monotone Adaptive Submodular Maximization26 Jul 2022
- 2022Group Equality in Adaptive Submodular Maximization7 Jul 2022
- 2021Partial-Adaptive Submodular Maximization1 Nov 2021
- 2021Robust Adaptive Submodular Maximization23 Jul 2021
- 2021Beyond Pointwise Submodularity: Non-Monotone Adaptive Submodular Maximization subject to Knapsack and k-System Constraints10 Apr 2021