mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A comparative study of stochastic and deep generative models for multisite precipitation synthesis

arXiv 2107.08074 ↗First posted 16 Jul 2021cs.LG cs.AI physics.ao-phcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Future climate change scenarios are usually hypothesized using simulations from weather generators. However, there only a few works comparing and evaluating promising deep learning models for weather generation against classical approaches. This study shows preliminary results making such evaluations for the multisite precipitation synthesis task. We compared two open-source weather generators: IBMWeathergen (an extension of the Weathergen library) and RGeneratePrec, and two deep generative models: GAN and VAE, on a variety of metrics. Our preliminary results can serve as a guide for improving the design of deep learning architectures and algorithms for the multisite precipitation synthesis task.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 15 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Jul 2021.

Builds on

3 of 15 references.

References · 3

  1. 2013Auto-Encoding Variational Bayescited by 4,053
  2. 2021Weather GAN: Multi-Domain Weather Translation Using Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 18
  3. 2020DeepClimGAN: A High-Resolution Climate Data Generatorcited by 9

Built on by

Not cited yet.