Uncertainty Prediction for Machine Learning Models of Material Properties
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Uncertainty quantification in Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based predictions of material properties is of immense importance for the success and reliability of AI applications in material science. While confidence intervals are commonly reported for machine learning (ML) models, prediction intervals, i.e., the evaluation of the uncertainty on each prediction, are seldomly available. In this work we compare 3 different approaches to obtain such individual uncertainty, testing them on 12 ML-physical properties. Specifically, we investigated using the Quantile loss function, machine learning the prediction intervals directly and using Gaussian Processes. We identify each approachs advantages and disadvantages and end up slightly favoring the modeling of the individual uncertainties directly, as it is the easiest to fit and, in most cases, minimizes over-and under-estimation of the predicted errors. All data for training and testing were taken from the publicly available JARVIS-DFT database, and the codes developed for computing the prediction intervals are available through JARVIS-Tools.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 1 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Jul 2021.
Builds on
1 of 39 references.
References · 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 4; 2023: 0; 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
10 papers.
- 2022Materials Property Prediction with Uncertainty Quantification: A Benchmark Studycited by 15
- 2025Large language models as uncertainty-calibrated optimizers for experimental discoverycited by 13
- 2022Uncertainty-Aware Mixed-Variable Machine Learning for Materials Designcited by 6
- 2024Reliability and Interpretability in Science and Deep Learningcited by 2
- 2022Artificial Intelligence in Material Engineering: A review on applications of AI in Material Engineeringcited by 1
- 2024An information-matching approach to optimal experimental design and active learningcited by 1
- 2022Building Robust Machine Learning Models for Small Chemical Science Data: The Case of Shear Viscositycited by 0
- 2025Training Variation of Physically-Informed Deep Learning Modelscited by 0
- 2026Modelling magnetic material properties with uncertainty-aware neural networkscited by 0
- 2026Distribution-Free Conformal Prediction for Steel Fatigue Strength: Marginal Validity Is Not Enoughcited by 0
- 2026Distribution-Free Conformal Prediction for Steel Fatigue Strength: Marginal Validity Is Not Enough5 Aug 2026
- 2026Modelling magnetic material properties with uncertainty-aware neural networks10 Jun 2026
- 2025Training Variation of Physically-Informed Deep Learning Models3 Oct 2025
- 2025Large language models as uncertainty-calibrated optimizers for experimental discovery8 Apr 2025
- 2024An information-matching approach to optimal experimental design and active learning5 Nov 2024
- 2024Reliability and Interpretability in Science and Deep Learning14 Jan 2024
- 2022Materials Property Prediction with Uncertainty Quantification: A Benchmark Study4 Nov 2022
- 2022Artificial Intelligence in Material Engineering: A review on applications of AI in Material Engineering15 Sep 2022
- 2022Building Robust Machine Learning Models for Small Chemical Science Data: The Case of Shear Viscosity23 Aug 2022
- 2022Uncertainty-Aware Mixed-Variable Machine Learning for Materials Design11 Jul 2022