mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Utilizing a digital swarm intelligence platform to improve consensus among radiologists and exploring its applications

arXiv 2107.07341 ↗First posted 26 Jun 2021cs.HC cs.AI cs.DCcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Radiologists today play a key role in making diagnostic decisions and labeling images for training A.I. algorithms. Low inter-reader reliability (IRR) can be seen between experts when interpreting challenging cases. While teams-based decisions are known to outperform individual decisions, inter-personal biases often creep up in group interactions which limit non-dominant participants from expressing true opinions. To overcome the dual problems of low consensus and inter-personal bias, we explored a solution modeled on biological swarms of bees. Two separate cohorts; three radiologists and five radiology residents collaborated on a digital swarm platform in real time and in a blinded fashion, grading meniscal lesions on knee MR exams. These consensus votes were benchmarked against clinical (arthroscopy) and radiological (senior-most radiologist) observations. The IRR of the consensus votes was compared to the IRR of the majority and most confident votes of the two cohorts.The radiologist cohort saw an improvement of 23% in IRR of swarm votes over majority vote. Similar improvement of 23% in IRR in 3-resident swarm votes over majority vote, was observed. The 5-resident swarm had an even higher improvement of 32% in IRR over majority vote. Swarm consensus votes also improved specificity by up to 50%. The swarm consensus votes outperformed individual and majority vote decisions in both the radiologists and resident cohorts. The 5-resident swarm had higher IRR than 3-resident swarm indicating positive effect of increased swarm size. The attending and resident swarms also outperformed predictions from a state-of-the-art A.I. algorithm. Utilizing a digital swarm platform improved agreement and allows participants to express judgement free intent, resulting in superior clinical performance and robust A.I. training labels.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Jun 2021.

Builds on

8 of 59 references.

References · 8

  1. 2018Learning to Reweight Examples for Robust Deep Learningcited by 670
  2. 2019Confident Learning: Estimating Uncertainty in Dataset Labelscited by 411
  3. 2017CleanNet: Transfer Learning for Scalable Image Classifier Training with Label Noisecited by 181
  4. 2019Deep learning with noisy labels: exploring techniques and remedies in medical image analysiscited by 173
  5. 2019Learning From Noisy Labels By Regularized Estimation Of Annotator Confusioncited by 126
  6. 2019Combating Label Noise in Deep Learning Using Abstentioncited by 86
  7. 2017Learning with Confident Examples: Rank Pruning for Robust Classification with Noisy Labelscited by 52
  8. 2017Separating Self-Expression and Visual Content in Hashtag Supervisioncited by 9

Built on by

Not cited yet.