Mitigating Memorization in Sample Selection for Learning with Noisy Labels
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Because deep learning is vulnerable to noisy labels, sample selection techniques, which train networks with only clean labeled data, have attracted a great attention. However, if the labels are dominantly corrupted by few classes, these noisy samples are called dominant-noisy-labeled samples, the network also learns dominant-noisy-labeled samples rapidly via content-aware optimization. In this study, we propose a compelling criteria to penalize dominant-noisy-labeled samples intensively through class-wise penalty labels. By averaging prediction confidences for the each observed label, we obtain suitable penalty labels that have high values if the labels are largely corrupted by some classes. Experiments were performed using benchmarks (CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, Tiny-ImageNet) and real-world datasets (ANIMAL-10N, Clothing1M) to evaluate the proposed criteria in various scenarios with different noise rates. Using the proposed sample selection, the learning process of the network becomes significantly robust to noisy labels compared to existing methods in several noise types.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Jul 2021.
Builds on
23 of 41 references.
References · 23
- 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 7,005
- 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,720
- 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,674
- 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,059
- 2016Temporal Ensembling for Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,057
- 2018Generalized Cross Entropy Loss for Training Deep Neural Networks with Noisy Labelscited by 997
- 2017A Closer Look at Memorization in Deep Networkscited by 942
- 2017Virtual Adversarial Training: A Regularization Method for Supervised and Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 920
- 2018Learning to Reweight Examples for Robust Deep Learningcited by 675
- 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 665
- 2017MentorNet: Learning Data-Driven Curriculum for Very Deep Neural Networks on Corrupted Labelscited by 653
- 2019Symmetric Cross Entropy for Robust Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 500
11 more
- 2019How does Disagreement Help Generalization against Label Corruption?cited by 390
- 2017Snapshot Ensembles: Train 1, get M for freecited by 350
- 2019Unsupervised Label Noise Modeling and Loss Correctioncited by 328
- 2014Training Deep Neural Networks on Noisy Labels with Bootstrappingcited by 322
- 2018Joint Optimization Framework for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 293
- 2017Decoupling "when to update" from "how to update"cited by 230
- 2018Using Trusted Data to Train Deep Networks on Labels Corrupted by Severe Noisecited by 216
- 2019Understanding and Utilizing Deep Neural Networks Trained with Noisy Labelscited by 209
- 2019NLNL: Negative Learning for Noisy Labelscited by 151
- 2017Active Bias: Training More Accurate Neural Networks by Emphasizing High Variance Samplescited by 147
- 2018Masking: A New Perspective of Noisy Supervisioncited by 93
Built on by
Not cited yet.