Learning from Crowds with Sparse and Imbalanced Annotations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Traditional supervised learning requires ground truth labels for the training data, whose collection can be difficult in many cases. Recently, crowdsourcing has established itself as an efficient labeling solution through resorting to non-expert crowds. To reduce the labeling error effects, one common practice is to distribute each instance to multiple workers, whereas each worker only annotates a subset of data, resulting in the it sparse annotation phenomenon. In this paper, we note that when meeting with class-imbalance, i.e., when the ground truth labels are it class-imbalanced, the sparse annotations are prone to be skewly distributed, which thus can severely bias the learning algorithm. To combat this issue, we propose one self-training based approach named it Self-Crowd by progressively adding confident pseudo-annotations and rebalancing the annotation distribution. Specifically, we propose one distribution aware confidence measure to select confident pseudo-annotations, which adopts the resampling strategy to oversample the minority annotations and undersample the majority annotations. On one real-world crowdsourcing image classification task, we show that the proposed method yields more balanced annotations throughout training than the distribution agnostic methods and substantially improves the learning performance at different annotation sparsity levels.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 83 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Jul 2021.
Builds on
30 of 83 references.
References · 30
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
- 2013Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentationcited by 2,162
- 2020FixMatch: Simplifying Semi-Supervised Learning with Consistency and Confidencecited by 2,085
- 2019MixMatch: A Holistic Approach to Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,391
- 2019Self-training with Noisy Student improves ImageNet classificationcited by 1,311
- 2019Class-Balanced Loss Based on Effective Number of Samplescited by 1,245
- 2017A Closer Look at Memorization in Deep Networkscited by 942
- 2019Decoupling Representation and Classifier for Long-Tailed Recognitioncited by 809
- 2015Cyclical Learning Rates for Training Neural Networkscited by 629
- 2017A systematic study of the class imbalance problem in convolutional neural networkscited by 513
18 more
- 2017Mean teachers are better role models: Weight-averaged consistency targets improve semi-supervised deep learning resultscited by 472
- 2019BBN: Bilateral-Branch Network with Cumulative Learning for Long-Tailed Visual Recognitioncited by 403
- 2021In Defense of Pseudo-Labeling: An Uncertainty-Aware Pseudo-label Selection Framework for Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 301
- 2019Label Propagation for Deep Semi-supervised Learningcited by 289
- 2020Long-Tailed Classification by Keeping the Good and Removing the Bad Momentum Causal Effectcited by 256
- 2018What is the Effect of Importance Weighting in Deep Learning?cited by 251
- 2015Semi-Supervised Learning with Ladder Networkscited by 247
- 2019Human uncertainty makes classification more robustcited by 235
- 2021CReST: A Class-Rebalancing Self-Training Framework for Imbalanced Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 175
- 2015Cost Sensitive Learning of Deep Feature Representations from Imbalanced Datacited by 167
- 2020Rethinking Class-Balanced Methods for Long-Tailed Visual Recognition from a Domain Adaptation Perspectivecited by 143
- 2019Learning From Noisy Labels By Regularized Estimation Of Annotator Confusioncited by 127
- 2017Deep learning from crowdscited by 105
- 2017Who Said What: Modeling Individual Labelers Improves Classificationcited by 77
- 2015The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Noisy Data for Fine-Grained Recognitioncited by 48
- 2020Learning from Crowds by Modeling Common Confusionscited by 32
- 2021All Labels Are Not Created Equal: Enhancing Semi-supervision via Label Grouping and Co-trainingcited by 32
- 2014Bayesian Nonparametric Crowdsourcingcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.
2 papers.