Hate speech detection using static BERT embeddings
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
With increasing popularity of social media platforms hate speech is emerging as a major concern, where it expresses abusive speech that targets specific group characteristics, such as gender, religion or ethnicity to spread violence. Earlier people use to verbally deliver hate speeches but now with the expansion of technology, some people are deliberately using social media platforms to spread hate by posting, sharing, commenting, etc. Whether it is Christchurch mosque shootings or hate crimes against Asians in west, it has been observed that the convicts are very much influenced from hate text present online. Even though AI systems are in place to flag such text but one of the key challenges is to reduce the false positive rate (marking non hate as hate), so that these systems can detect hate speech without undermining the freedom of expression. In this paper, we use ETHOS hate speech detection dataset and analyze the performance of hate speech detection classifier by replacing or integrating the word embeddings (fastText (FT), GloVe (GV) or FT + GV) with static BERT embeddings (BE). With the extensive experimental trails it is observed that the neural network performed better with static BE compared to using FT, GV or FT + GV as word embeddings. In comparison to fine-tuned BERT, one metric that significantly improved is specificity.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jun 2021.
Builds on
9 of 30 references.
References · 9
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,530
- 2014Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translationcited by 4,016
- 2013Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionalitycited by 3,462
- 2017Automated Hate Speech Detection and the Problem of Offensive Languagecited by 724
- 2017Deep Learning for Hate Speech Detection in Tweetscited by 180
- 2020Automated diagnosis of COVID-19 with limited posteroanterior chest X-ray images using fine-tuned deep neural networkscited by 14
- 2021BERT-Based Sentiment Analysis: A Software Engineering Perspectivecited by 9
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
4 papers.
- 2025A survey of textual cyber abuse detection using cutting-edge language models and large language modelscited by 3
- 2022Speech Detection Task Against Asian Hate: BERT the Central, While Data-Centric Studies the Crucialcited by 0
- 2024Non-Contextual BERT or FastText? A Comparative Analysiscited by 0
- 2026Efficient Adaptation of LLMs for Hate Speech Detection in Low-Resource Languages: A Comparative Study on Roman Urducited by 0
- 2026Efficient Adaptation of LLMs for Hate Speech Detection in Low-Resource Languages: A Comparative Study on Roman Urdu6 Aug 2026
- 2025A survey of textual cyber abuse detection using cutting-edge language models and large language models9 Jan 2025
- 2024Non-Contextual BERT or FastText? A Comparative Analysis26 Nov 2024
- 2022Speech Detection Task Against Asian Hate: BERT the Central, While Data-Centric Studies the Crucial5 Jun 2022