mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Soft Attention: Does it Actually Help to Learn Social Interactions in Pedestrian Trajectory Prediction?

arXiv 2106.15321 ↗First posted 16 Jun 2021cs.CV cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We consider the problem of predicting the future path of a pedestrian using its motion history and the motion history of the surrounding pedestrians, called social information. Since the seminal paper on Social-LSTM, deep-learning has become the main tool used to model the impact of social interactions on a pedestrian's motion. The demonstration that these models can learn social interactions relies on an ablative study of these models. The models are compared with and without their social interactions module on two standard metrics, the Average Displacement Error and Final Displacement Error. Yet, these complex models were recently outperformed by a simple constant-velocity approach. This questions if they actually allow to model social interactions as well as the validity of the proof. In this paper, we focus on the deep-learning models with a soft-attention mechanism for social interaction modeling and study whether they use social information at prediction time. We conduct two experiments across four state-of-the-art approaches on the ETH and UCY datasets, which were also used in previous work. First, the models are trained by replacing the social information with random noise and compared to model trained with actual social information. Second, we use a gating mechanism along with a L0 penalty, allowing models to shut down their inner components. The models consistently learn to prune their soft-attention mechanism. For both experiments, neither the course of the convergence nor the prediction performance were altered. This demonstrates that the soft-attention mechanism and therefore the social information are ignored by the models.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Jun 2021.

Builds on

19 of 38 references.

References · 19

  1. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
  2. 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,923
  3. 2015Show, Attend and Tell: Neural Image Caption Generation with Visual Attentioncited by 1,423
  4. 2019Analyzing Multi-Head Self-Attention: Specialized Heads Do the Heavy Lifting, the Rest Can Be Prunedcited by 856
  5. 2018Social GAN: Socially Acceptable Trajectories with Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 690
  6. 2017Learning Sparse Neural Networks through L0 Regularizationcited by 583
  7. 2017DESIRE: Distant Future Prediction in Dynamic Scenes with Interacting Agentscited by 310
  8. 2018SoPhie: An Attentive GAN for Predicting Paths Compliant to Social and Physical Constraintscited by 298
  9. 2019Social-BiGAT: Multimodal Trajectory Forecasting using Bicycle-GAN and Graph Attention Networkscited by 229
  10. 2018Convolutional Social Pooling for Vehicle Trajectory Predictioncited by 221
  11. 2019The inD Dataset: A Drone Dataset of Naturalistic Road User Trajectories at German Intersectionscited by 137
  12. 2018TrafficPredict: Trajectory Prediction for Heterogeneous Traffic-Agentscited by 111
7 more
  1. 2019What the Constant Velocity Model Can Teach Us About Pedestrian Motion Predictioncited by 80
  2. 2019Social Ways: Learning Multi-Modal Distributions of Pedestrian Trajectories with GANscited by 79
  3. 2017VAIN: Attentional Multi-agent Predictive Modelingcited by 53
  4. 2017CAR-Net: Clairvoyant Attentive Recurrent Networkcited by 34
  5. 2017Human Trajectory Prediction using Spatially aware Deep Attention Modelscited by 12
  6. 2016Knowledge Transfer for Scene-specific Motion Predictioncited by 11
  7. 2017Modeling Cooperative Navigation in Dense Human Crowdscited by 10

Built on by

Not cited yet.