mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Jitter: Random Jittering Loss Function

arXiv 2106.13749 ↗First posted 25 Jun 2021cs.LGcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Regularization plays a vital role in machine learning optimization. One novel regularization method called flooding makes the training loss fluctuate around the flooding level. It intends to make the model continue to random walk until it comes to a flat loss landscape to enhance generalization. However, the hyper-parameter flooding level of the flooding method fails to be selected properly and uniformly. We propose a novel method called Jitter to improve it. Jitter is essentially a kind of random loss function. Before training, we randomly sample the Jitter Point from a specific probability distribution. The flooding level should be replaced by Jitter point to obtain a new target function and train the model accordingly. As Jitter point acting as a random factor, we actually add some randomness to the loss function, which is consistent with the fact that there exists innumerable random behaviors in the learning process of the machine learning model and is supposed to make the model more robust. In addition, Jitter performs random walk randomly which divides the loss curve into small intervals and then flipping them over, ideally making the loss curve much flatter and enhancing generalization ability. Moreover, Jitter can be a domain-, task-, and model-independent regularization method and train the model effectively after the training error reduces to zero. Our experimental results show that Jitter method can improve model performance more significantly than the previous flooding method and make the test loss curve descend twice.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Jun 2021.

Builds on

16 of 42 references.

References · 16

  1. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  2. 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
  3. 2018Reconciling modern machine learning practice and the bias-variance trade-offcited by 919
  4. 2019Deep Double Descent: Where Bigger Models and More Data Hurtcited by 667
  5. 2018Bag of Tricks for Image Classification with Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 430
  6. 2017The Effectiveness of Data Augmentation in Image Classification using Deep Learningcited by 368
  7. 2018DropBlock: A regularization method for convolutional networkscited by 261
  8. 2019Adversarial AutoAugmentcited by 111
  9. 2018Overfitting or perfect fitting? Risk bounds for classification and regression rules that interpolatecited by 99
  10. 2020Delving Deep into Label Smoothingcited by 94
  11. 2020Do We Need Zero Training Loss After Achieving Zero Training Error?cited by 61
  12. 2021AutoDropout: Learning Dropout Patterns to Regularize Deep Networkscited by 35
4 more
  1. 2019Data Augmentation Revisited: Rethinking the Distribution Gap between Clean and Augmented Datacited by 33
  2. 2020Towards Understanding Label Smoothingcited by 17
  3. 2020Batch Group Normalizationcited by 9
  4. 2021Data Augmentation for Object Detection via Differentiable Neural Renderingcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 2.

3 papers.