mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Human-in-the-loop model explanation via verbatim boundary identification in generated neighborhoods

arXiv 2106.13093 ↗First posted 24 Jun 2021cs.AIcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The black-box nature of machine learning models limits their use in case-critical applications, raising faithful and ethical concerns that lead to trust crises. One possible way to mitigate this issue is to understand how a (mispredicted) decision is carved out from the decision boundary. This paper presents a human-in-the-loop approach to explain machine learning models using verbatim neighborhood manifestation. Contrary to most of the current eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) systems, which provide hit-or-miss approximate explanations, our approach generates the local decision boundary of the given instance and enables human intelligence to conclude the model behavior. Our method can be divided into three stages: 1) a neighborhood generation stage, which generates instances based on the given sample; 2) a classification stage, which yields classifications on the generated instances to carve out the local decision boundary and delineate the model behavior; and 3) a human-in-the-loop stage, which involves human to refine and explore the neighborhood of interest. In the generation stage, a generative model is used to generate the plausible synthetic neighbors around the given instance. After the classification stage, the classified neighbor instances provide a multifaceted understanding of the model behavior. Three intervention points are provided in the human-in-the-loop stage, enabling humans to leverage their own intelligence to interpret the model behavior. Several experiments on two datasets are conducted, and the experimental results demonstrate the potential of our proposed approach for boosting human understanding of the complex machine learning model.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Jun 2021.

Builds on

11 of 19 references.

References · 11

  1. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
  2. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  3. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
  4. 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,348
  5. 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,278
  6. 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,454
  7. 2017Grad-CAM++: Improved Visual Explanations for Deep Convolutional Networkscited by 936
  8. 2019Score-CAM: Score-Weighted Visual Explanations for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 575
  9. 2016Not Just a Black Box: Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 295
  10. 2019Explaining Deep Neural Networks with a Polynomial Time Algorithm for Shapley Values Approximationcited by 115
  11. 2019Characterizing the Decision Boundary of Deep Neural Networkscited by 32

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 4.

4 papers.