SGTBN: Generating Dense Depth Maps from Single-Line LiDAR
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Depth completion aims to generate a dense depth map from the sparse depth map and aligned RGB image. However, current depth completion methods use extremely expensive 64-line LiDAR(about 100,000) to obtain sparse depth maps, which will limit their application scenarios. Compared with the 64-line LiDAR, the single-line LiDAR is much less expensive and much more robust. Therefore, we propose a method to tackle the problem of single-line depth completion, in which we aim to generate a dense depth map from the single-line LiDAR info and the aligned RGB image. A single-line depth completion dataset is proposed based on the existing 64-line depth completion dataset(KITTI). A network called Semantic Guided Two-Branch Network(SGTBN) which contains global and local branches to extract and fuse global and local info is proposed for this task. A Semantic guided depth upsampling module is used in our network to make full use of the semantic info in RGB images. Except for the usual MSE loss, we add the virtual normal loss to increase the constraint of high-order 3D geometry in our network. Our network outperforms the state-of-the-art in the single-line depth completion task. Besides, compared with the monocular depth estimation, our method also has significant advantages in precision and model size.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Jun 2021.
Builds on
11 of 20 references.
References · 11
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2014Depth Map Prediction from a Single Image using a Multi-Scale Deep Networkcited by 1,264
- 2019From Big to Small: Multi-Scale Local Planar Guidance for Monocular Depth Estimationcited by 379
- 2017Sparsity Invariant CNNscited by 325
- 2019Enforcing geometric constraints of virtual normal for depth predictioncited by 233
- 2018Self-supervised Sparse-to-Dense: Self-supervised Depth Completion from LiDAR and Monocular Cameracited by 140
- 2018DeepLiDAR: Deep Surface Normal Guided Depth Prediction for Outdoor Scene from Sparse LiDAR Data and Single Color Imagecited by 129
- 2019CARAFE: Content-Aware ReAssembly of FEaturescited by 119
- 2020Gradient Centralization: A New Optimization Technique for Deep Neural Networkscited by 82
- 2019Sparse and noisy LiDAR completion with RGB guidance and uncertaintycited by 79
- 2018Confidence Propagation through CNNs for Guided Sparse Depth Regressioncited by 52
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
6 papers.
- 2022Deep Depth Completion from Extremely Sparse Data: A Surveycited by 33
- 2023Predictive World Models from Real-World Partial Observationscited by 4
- 2023Prior based Sampling for Adaptive LiDARcited by 2
- 2025Geo3DVQA: Evaluating Vision-Language Models for 3D Geospatial Reasoning from Aerial Imagerycited by 1
- 2026Improved monocular depth prediction using distance transform over pre-semantic contours with self-supervised neural networkscited by 1
- 2022Robust and accurate depth estimation by fusing LiDAR and Stereocited by 0
- 2026Improved monocular depth prediction using distance transform over pre-semantic contours with self-supervised neural networks8 May 2026
- 2025Geo3DVQA: Evaluating Vision-Language Models for 3D Geospatial Reasoning from Aerial Imagery8 Dec 2025
- 2023Prior based Sampling for Adaptive LiDAR14 Apr 2023
- 2023Predictive World Models from Real-World Partial Observations12 Jan 2023
- 2022Robust and accurate depth estimation by fusing LiDAR and Stereo13 Jul 2022
- 2022Deep Depth Completion from Extremely Sparse Data: A Survey11 May 2022