Leveraging semantically similar queries for ranking via combining representations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In modern ranking problems, different and disparate representations of the items to be ranked are often available. It is sensible, then, to try to combine these representations to improve ranking. Indeed, learning to rank via combining representations is both principled and practical for learning a ranking function for a particular query. In extremely data-scarce settings, however, the amount of labeled data available for a particular query can lead to a highly variable and ineffective ranking function. One way to mitigate the effect of the small amount of data is to leverage information from semantically similar queries. Indeed, as we demonstrate in simulation settings and real data examples, when semantically similar queries are available it is possible to gainfully use them when ranking with respect to a particular query. We describe and explore this phenomenon in the context of the bias-variance trade off and apply it to the data-scarce settings of a Bing navigational graph and the Drosophila larva connectome.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Jun 2021.
Builds on
13 of 36 references.
References · 13
- 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,284
- 2018UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reductioncited by 2,841
- 2016node2vec: Scalable Feature Learning for Networkscited by 1,913
- 2018Deep Visual Domain Adaptation: A Surveycited by 634
- 2018Learning from positive and unlabeled data: a surveycited by 218
- 2017Statistical inference on random dot product graphs: a surveycited by 70
- 2018VERSE: Versatile Graph Embeddings from Similarity Measurescited by 54
- 2019NetSMF: Large-Scale Network Embedding as Sparse Matrix Factorizationcited by 48
- 2019GraSPy: Graph Statistics in Pythoncited by 15
- 2013Vertex nomination schemes for membership predictioncited by 8
- 2019Vertex Nomination, Consistent Estimation, and Adversarial Modificationcited by 7
- 2018Vertex nomination: The canonical sampling and the extended spectral nomination schemescited by 6
1 more
- 2017On consistent vertex nomination schemescited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2.
2 papers.